1971
DOI: 10.1177/001316447103100220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Another Contribution to Estimating Success in Graduate School: a Search for Sex Differences and Comparison Between three Degree Types

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of concern in the profession is the question of whether or not sdhools discriminate against women in the selection and treatment of graduate students. For example, Payne et al (1971) found among education Ph.D.s at the University of Georgia that females had higher average predictor scores than men, some differences being quite large, and raised the question of a selection bias, self or institutional.…”
Section: Doctoral Study Attrition In Psychologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of concern in the profession is the question of whether or not sdhools discriminate against women in the selection and treatment of graduate students. For example, Payne et al (1971) found among education Ph.D.s at the University of Georgia that females had higher average predictor scores than men, some differences being quite large, and raised the question of a selection bias, self or institutional.…”
Section: Doctoral Study Attrition In Psychologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice between the two rests on the decision to include or not include the correlation in the equation. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT 1980,40 THERE have been a number of studies regarding the relationship of the GRE and MAT, either separately or in combination, with subsequent academic performance (e.g., Felker, 1973;Krauskopf, 1973;Mehrabian, 1969;Nagi, 1975;Payne, Wells, and Clarke, 1971). Other studies have been done on retesting (Coldarci, 1960;Doppelt, 1971;Spielberger, 1959).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%