Another “Critique,” Same Old Song: A Brief Rebuttal to Gómez Coutouly

Boëda, Éric; Pérez-Balarezo, Antonio; Ramos, Marcos Paulo

doi:10.1080/20555563.2021.1985051

Cited by 5 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…They concede that a minor part (if any) of the stone tools may have been the result of monkey activities. In any case, they sustain that most (if not all) the artifacts were created by humans, a proposal supported by more recent contributions (Boëda et al, 2021a, 2021b, 2022; Lourdeau, 2019).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 58%

“…As indicated above, Pleistocene archeological sites from Piauí area, at Brazil are among the most debated pieces of evidence concerning the early peopling of the Americas (Boëda et al, 2013(Boëda et al, , 2021a(Boëda et al, , 2021b(Boëda et al, , 2022Lourdeau, 2019;Parenti et al, 2018). Among the most representative sites are Pedra Furada (see Parenti, 2001), Sitio do Meio (Aimola et al, 2014;Boëda et al, 2016), Vale da Pedra Furada (Boëda et al, 2014a(Boëda et al, , 2021b, and Toca da Tira Peia (Lahaye et al, 2013).…”

Section: Pleistocene Archeological Sites From Northeastern Brazil: a ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…He considered this together with the possibility that these stone tools were geofacts produced by the actions of gravity and waterfalls or that were made by a conservative Homo sapiens population. Parenti et al (2018); see also Boëda et al, 2021aBoëda et al, , 2021bBoëda et al, , 2022, criticized Fiedel suggestion and proposed that "Pedra Furada" materials are mostly of human origin. More recent contributions also sustain this view (Boëda et al, 2021a(Boëda et al, , 2021b(Boëda et al, , 2022Gruhn, 2018;Lourdeau, 2019).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Parenti et al (2018); see also Boëda et al, 2021aBoëda et al, , 2021bBoëda et al, , 2022, criticized Fiedel suggestion and proposed that "Pedra Furada" materials are mostly of human origin. More recent contributions also sustain this view (Boëda et al, 2021a(Boëda et al, , 2021b(Boëda et al, , 2022Gruhn, 2018;Lourdeau, 2019).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The origin of Pleistocene archeological sites from Brazil constitute a hotly debated topic on the archeology of the early peopling of the Americas (Araujo, 2014; Bahn, 1993; Boëda et al, 2021a, 2021b, 2022; Borrero, 1995, 2015, 2016; Clemente-Conte et al, 2017; Dennell and Hurcombe, 1995; Dillehay, 2000; Fiedel, 2017; Gomez-Coutouly, 2022; Guidon, 1997; Guidon et al, 1996; Lourdeau, 2019; Meltzer et al, 1994; Parenti, 2001; Parenti et al, 2018; Politis, 1999; Prous, 1997; Prous and Fogaça, 1999; Vialou et al, 2017). These sites include the most robust and coherent evidence sustaining an early human population (prior to the Late Glacial Maximum) of the South American continent, and constitute an important supporting evidence for other less well-known Pleistocene sites distributed along South America (e.g.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Holocene capuchin-monkey stone tool deposits shed doubts on the human origin of archeological sites from the Pleistocene of Brazil

Agnolin

Agnolín

2022

The Holocene

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

New World capuchin monkeys are well-known by their ability to solve problems using stone tools that have the characteristics and morphology of some human-made stone tools. The aim of the present contribution is to carry out brief comparisons between the Pleistocene archeological sites from Brazil (e.g. Pedra Furada, Sitio do Meio, Vale da Pedra Furada, Toca da Tira Peia) and capuchin-made stone tool deposits. Pleistocene sites from Brazil are characterized by the exclusive use of immediately available raw material, the predominance of unifacial flaking, and abundance of cortical flakes, together with the absence of blades and bifacial thinning techniques. In all these aspects, the sites resemble capuchin-made lithic deposits and lack a number of human attributes. In sum, based on positive and negative evidence we are confident that the early archeological sites from Brazil may not be human-derived but may belong to capuchin monkeys.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 58%

Section: Pleistocene Archeological Sites From Northeastern Brazil: a ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Holocene capuchin-monkey stone tool deposits shed doubts on the human origin of archeological sites from the Pleistocene of Brazil

Agnolin

Agnolín

2022

The Holocene

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Early anthropic occupation and geomorphological changes in South America: human–environment interactions and OSL data from the Rincão I site, southeastern Brazil

Cheliz¹,

Giannini

Sousa

et al. 2023

J Quaternary Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article aims to refine the description of the artefacts and the geomorphological, geological, pedological and chronological (optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) analyses of sedimentary deposits) characterisation of the Rincão I site (southeastern Brazil) to contribute to the understanding of early human–environment interactions. The archaeological site occupation took place on hillslopes truncated by the Mogi‐Guaçu River's lateral (~1200 m) and vertical (~5 m) movements during the Late Quaternary, in an area where in situ bedrock outcrops are uncommon. This geological context favoured human groups simultaneously having access to the resources provided by the alluvial plain and hillslopes. Here we describe how about three hundred lithic artefacts are associated with soils that originated from sandy colluvium with OSL ages between 20.3 and 5.5 thousand years. These ages are consistent with the local palaeopedological and geomorphological contexts of landscape changes, and partly controversial from the perspective of models currently in vogue for the human occupation of southeastern Brazil. The vestiges of past human presence amid the hillslope sandy colluvium deposits include: 1) a set of flakes and formal artefacts (one stemmed point and three convex artefacts) made of sandstone obtained from hillslopes near (<10 km) the site; and 2) predominant detritus and flakes of quartz and flint obtained mostly from the adjacent (<1.5 km) alluvial plain, linked to flaking sequences other than those of the formal artefacts. Only quartz artefacts were found in the lower levels of the site stratigraphy, whereas in the intermediate and upper levels quartz, flint and sandstone artefacts were found, suggesting that there were changes in the raw materials used for flaking over time. The formal artefacts from the site have technological attributes like the ones observed in assemblages associated with a previously known lithic industry (Rioclarense), but a different pattern of choice of raw materials. This suggests that technical standards underwent a process of adaptation to the environmental particularities surrounding the Rincão I site.

show abstract

The Contributions of Luminescence Dating of Sediments to Understanding the First Settlement of the Americas

Feathers

2023

PaleoAmerica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Another “Critique,” Same Old Song: A Brief Rebuttal to Gómez Coutouly

Cited by 5 publications

References 30 publications

Holocene capuchin-monkey stone tool deposits shed doubts on the human origin of archeological sites from the Pleistocene of Brazil

Holocene capuchin-monkey stone tool deposits shed doubts on the human origin of archeological sites from the Pleistocene of Brazil

Early anthropic occupation and geomorphological changes in South America: human–environment interactions and OSL data from the Rincão I site, southeastern Brazil

The Contributions of Luminescence Dating of Sediments to Understanding the First Settlement of the Americas

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About