2021
DOI: 10.1111/jpim.12573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Another day, another chance: Daily workplace experiences and their impact on creativity

Abstract: Creative climate research shows that an employee's perception of their work environment impacts their creative performance. However, variable-centered approaches (e.g., moderated regression) are often unable to study all climate factors interacting simultaneously, with researchers only able to focus on a few factors at a time. Further, longitudinal climate research shows these perceptions fluctuate over time. To overcome some limitations of variable-centered approaches, we use a person-centered approach with a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since past EMA studies have not attempted to measure creative ideation performance, we hope that the integration of this novel approach into the research literature will stimulate a move of creativity research from the laboratories into more naturalistic environments (Silvia, 2017). Although the ABC does not inform about the idiosyncratic creative activities people choose to do in their natural environments and about everyday creativity (Ilha Villanova & Pina e Cunha, 2020), it could be combined with the EMA of self-reported creativity (see, e.g., Campbell et al., 2020 for a similar approach with respect to cognitive performance, for valuable suggestions see Cotter & Silvia, 2019) and the use of text-based methods to assess creativity (e.g., Amabile et al, 2005; Hagtvedt et al, 2019; McKay et al, 2021). In the future, it will be vital to conduct more research (1) on types of applied tasks, (2) on the correlations with real-world and natural occurring creativity (e.g., Diedrich et al, 2018), and (3) on originality judgment to provide optimal statistical properties to capture within-person variance of creative ideation performance, such as centering originality scores within-person.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since past EMA studies have not attempted to measure creative ideation performance, we hope that the integration of this novel approach into the research literature will stimulate a move of creativity research from the laboratories into more naturalistic environments (Silvia, 2017). Although the ABC does not inform about the idiosyncratic creative activities people choose to do in their natural environments and about everyday creativity (Ilha Villanova & Pina e Cunha, 2020), it could be combined with the EMA of self-reported creativity (see, e.g., Campbell et al., 2020 for a similar approach with respect to cognitive performance, for valuable suggestions see Cotter & Silvia, 2019) and the use of text-based methods to assess creativity (e.g., Amabile et al, 2005; Hagtvedt et al, 2019; McKay et al, 2021). In the future, it will be vital to conduct more research (1) on types of applied tasks, (2) on the correlations with real-world and natural occurring creativity (e.g., Diedrich et al, 2018), and (3) on originality judgment to provide optimal statistical properties to capture within-person variance of creative ideation performance, such as centering originality scores within-person.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first article “Another Day, Another Chance: Daily Workplace Experiences and Their Impact on Creativity,” McKay et al (2022) use latent profile analysis to examine daily workplace experiences over time and how they relate to creativity. Basing their analysis on a large archival data set of daily surveys about the work environment in organizational projects, they identify specific daily workplace experience profiles that influence employee creative performance.…”
Section: The Articles In This Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%