2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10892-005-7987-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Another Look at a Moral Statute of Limitations on Injustice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Legally, we do that for all sorts of reasons, some principled and others pragmatic (Galanter 2002, 111) and not all morally of much merit (Roberts 2003;2007). Even at law, however, there are some wrongs that are deemed to be so grievous that no statute of limitations can apply.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Legally, we do that for all sorts of reasons, some principled and others pragmatic (Galanter 2002, 111) and not all morally of much merit (Roberts 2003;2007). Even at law, however, there are some wrongs that are deemed to be so grievous that no statute of limitations can apply.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Of course we could quash questions of historical injustice altogether through a statute of limitations, rendering wrongs committed long ago no longer actionable (Offe 1992). Legally, we do that for all sorts of reasons, some principled and others pragmatic (Galanter 2002, 111) and not all morally of much merit (Roberts 2003; 2007). Even at law, however, there are some wrongs that are deemed to be so grievous that no statute of limitations can apply.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%