2008
DOI: 10.1002/prot.22320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Another look at the conditions for the extraction of protein knowledge‐based potentials

Abstract: Protein knowledge-based potentials are effective free energies obtained from databases of known protein structures. They are used to parameterize coarse-grained protein models in many folding simulation and structure prediction methods. Two common approaches are used in the derivation of knowledge-based potentials. One assumes that the energy parameters optimize the native structure stability. The other assumes that interaction events are related to their energies according to the Boltzmann distribution, and t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Folding-inspired approaches utilize known folding behavior to tune CG parameters that will result in a properly folded protein [18][22]. In a somewhat similar fashion, knowledge-based methods invoke statistical potentials derived from distributions of residue-residue interactions and secondary structure in all known protein structures [3], [13], [23][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Folding-inspired approaches utilize known folding behavior to tune CG parameters that will result in a properly folded protein [18][22]. In a somewhat similar fashion, knowledge-based methods invoke statistical potentials derived from distributions of residue-residue interactions and secondary structure in all known protein structures [3], [13], [23][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This matrix was obtained from databases of known protein structures and has difference from the mean .... been used in some of the best known protein structure prediction and folding modeling algorithms [12][13][14]. In 1985, Miyazawa and Jernigan formalized the theory for contact interactions among 20 natural AAs based on the quasi-chemical approximation, which treats the chain connectivity effects and solvent effects with simple inter-residue parameters [37,38]. The M-J matrix was revised in 1996, in which there were 6 times more residue-residue contact pairs and used 1168 protein structures containing 1661 subunit sequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the M-J matrix used by Kosmrlj et al was the 1996 version, such higher order structure contributions were not considered. Moreover, because the quasi-chemical approximation breaks down at low temperature, we should be careful when applying the M-J matrix and similar models to temperature-dependent phenomena [38].…”
Section: Tcrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We quantitatively recovered the original interaction potentials directly from structural correlations by solving the generalized-YBG equation (35) for this "extended" canonical ensemble (37). Several earlier studies have directly recovered contact potentials (64,65) or iteratively determined model potentials (32,(66)(67)(68). In contrast, we quantitatively recovered a complete molecular potential directly from a databank of off-lattice protein structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two most common criticisms of knowledge-based approaches address (i) the approximate treatment of many-body correlations and, in particular, chain connectivity (26,27,(30)(31)(32)(33) and (ii) the treatment of structural statistics compiled from different proteins (27). It is well known that, for any condensed phase system, simple excluded volume (packing) effects generate nontrivial many-body correlations that complicate the relationship between interparticle interactions and structural correlations (34).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%