1971
DOI: 10.1016/0027-5107(71)90005-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Another two genes controlling mitotic intragenic recombination and recovery from UV damage in Aspergillus nidulans III. Photoreactivition of UV damage in uvsD and uvsE mutants

Abstract: In this paper photoreactivation of UV damage in growing uvs ÷, uvsD53 and uvsE82 conidia of Aspergillus nidulans is examined. The results indicate that uvs + and uvsE82 conidia immediately start to lose photoreactivable lesions following incubation in the dark, but that uvsD53 conidia retain these lesions for at least several hours. The observations are interpreted as indicating that uvs + and uvsE82 conidia are excision-efficient but that uvsD53 is defective in excision repair.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, these two checkpoint mechanisms may actually overlap as they both monitor, and respond to, the state of DNA, and therefore may share common components of a checkpoint signal transduction pathway leading to Tyr15 phosphorylation of p34 cdc2 . This hypothesis is supported by the observations that A.nidulans cells bearing mutations in uvsB or uvsD , which were originally isolated as UV irradiation‐sensitive mutants (Jansen, 1970; Fortuin, 1971), are deficient not only in S‐phase checkpoint control but also in the G 2 /M DNA damage checkpoint control (X.Ye, A.Tang, R.Fincher and S.Osmani, unpublished results). Similarly, several genes have been identified in fission yeasts that are required for both S‐phase and G 2 /M checkpoint controls (Carr, 1995) and these functions may also influence the Tyr15 phosphorylation state of p34 cdc2 , although this has not as yet been tested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In addition, these two checkpoint mechanisms may actually overlap as they both monitor, and respond to, the state of DNA, and therefore may share common components of a checkpoint signal transduction pathway leading to Tyr15 phosphorylation of p34 cdc2 . This hypothesis is supported by the observations that A.nidulans cells bearing mutations in uvsB or uvsD , which were originally isolated as UV irradiation‐sensitive mutants (Jansen, 1970; Fortuin, 1971), are deficient not only in S‐phase checkpoint control but also in the G 2 /M DNA damage checkpoint control (X.Ye, A.Tang, R.Fincher and S.Osmani, unpublished results). Similarly, several genes have been identified in fission yeasts that are required for both S‐phase and G 2 /M checkpoint controls (Carr, 1995) and these functions may also influence the Tyr15 phosphorylation state of p34 cdc2 , although this has not as yet been tested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…With the total genome sequence available, it will now be possible to analyse all components of pathways or complexes and their interactions, and also to obtain disruption or deletion strains of all genes of interest, including the genes for well-characterized mutants involved in DNA repair [e.g., the uvsE gene of Fortuin (1971) which is closely related and epistatic with uvsC RAD51 and shows similar effects on recombination but not on mutation (E. Kafer and S.-K. Chae, unpublished observations)]. …”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UV irradiation and MMS treatment UV survival was determined as described by Fortuin (1970), with minor modi®cations: spores were plated (in triplicate) on CM in three concentrations (between 10 6 and 10 2 spores/plate). After preincubation for 6 h at 37°C, the plates were UV irradiated (18 erg/mm 2 /s) for various periods of time (up to 90 s).…”
Section: Northern Blot Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%