2011
DOI: 10.7763/ijiet.2011.v1.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ANP-FIS Method for Determining the Knowledge Management Strategy

Abstract: Abstract-The suitable strategy is the critical influential factor on the success of knowledge management (KM) implementation in an organization. The purpose of this research is presenting a hybrid method to determine the knowledge management strategy. Here, a model has been proposed with the use of ANP as one of the MCDM techniques to identify the most suitable knowledge management strategy and a Fuzzy Expert System has been designed to specify the best hybrid dynamic strategy. The presented steps have been ru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, identification and discovery of the factors preventing strategic alignment in the organization will help correct and eliminate the misalignment and there must also be continuous review and monitoring to maintain strategic alignment in the organization. The institution's seriousness about knowledge nurtures an environment and culture that support continuous learning (Nadali et al, 2011). Culture is a major structural framework for knowledge activities and should be considered when new knowledge activities are suggested, as culture affects how they are accepted and nurtured If knowledge activities are supposed to be a coherent aspect of how things are done in an institution, they have to be a coherent aspect of culture (Monavvarian et al, 2011) that must be considered in expressing the mission, vision, and purpose and be emphasized in the educational and communication activities of the institute to ensure the successful implementation of educational activities (Yousif AL-Hakim & Hassan, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, identification and discovery of the factors preventing strategic alignment in the organization will help correct and eliminate the misalignment and there must also be continuous review and monitoring to maintain strategic alignment in the organization. The institution's seriousness about knowledge nurtures an environment and culture that support continuous learning (Nadali et al, 2011). Culture is a major structural framework for knowledge activities and should be considered when new knowledge activities are suggested, as culture affects how they are accepted and nurtured If knowledge activities are supposed to be a coherent aspect of how things are done in an institution, they have to be a coherent aspect of culture (Monavvarian et al, 2011) that must be considered in expressing the mission, vision, and purpose and be emphasized in the educational and communication activities of the institute to ensure the successful implementation of educational activities (Yousif AL-Hakim & Hassan, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%