“…Furthermore, the availability of stereocenters allows the synthesis of stereocontrolled polymers, whereby highly isotactic polypropylene (iPP) builds a 3/1 helix by virtue of the repulsive interaction of the methyl groups, whereas syndiotactic polypropylene (sPP) forms a trans-planar zigzag configuration in addition to a s(2/1)2 helix. , For the purpose of processing of UHMWPP in a fashion similar to that of UHMWPE, e.g., gel extrusion for fiber spinning, UHMW-sPP is considered to be far better suited than the isotactic alternative, because the zigzag configuration is similar to the microstructure of the processable UHMWPE . In general, the macromolecular characteristics of the resulting polypropylene, such as its molecular weight and melting transition, can be adjusted by a change in fundamental motifs in catalyst design: e.g., the ligand or the central group IV metal atom of ansa -metallocene dichlorides. − In the literature, for the synthesis of ultrahigh molecular weight polypropylene, hafnium is recommended instead of zirconium as the central metal atom, because the corresponding Hf homologues yielded up to a 10-fold higher molecular weight of polypropylene. , …”