1994
DOI: 10.3928/0022-0124-19940701-06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Answer Changing: A Meta-Analysis of the Prevalence and Patterns

Abstract: In order to determine the prevalence and patterns of answer-changing behavior, a meta-analysis of 61 studies was conducted. The findings of the individual primary studies were supported, which increased confidence in the conclusion that most students will change answers and this behavior will likely improve test scores. Moreover, neither age, gender, academic ability, personality traits, beliefs about answer changing, nor item characteristics systematically influenced answer-changing behavior. Practitioners of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Changing answers on multiple-choice examinations is another test-taking strategy that is often underestimated and underutilized. Consistent research evidence shows that changing answers produces higher test scores (___ 2017;Waddell & Blankenship, 1994) although many students tend to believe that they should stick with their original answers. Most probably this is due to intense negative feelings stemming from ineffective answer changes that they had made on items that they "sweated over" in past tests (Hingham & Gerald, 2005).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Changing answers on multiple-choice examinations is another test-taking strategy that is often underestimated and underutilized. Consistent research evidence shows that changing answers produces higher test scores (___ 2017;Waddell & Blankenship, 1994) although many students tend to believe that they should stick with their original answers. Most probably this is due to intense negative feelings stemming from ineffective answer changes that they had made on items that they "sweated over" in past tests (Hingham & Gerald, 2005).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A modern version of the erroneous belief in first answers may derive from claims for the efficacy of thin-sliced, fast thinking rather than thick-sliced, slow thinking [30,31]. A 1994 meta-analysis confirmed that changed answers in MCQs are more likely to be correct [32], an effect seen in a more recent study [33]. We also have ClickStream data from a recent undergraduate and a recent postgraduate exam showing that changed answers are more likely to be correct.…”
Section: Developing and Extending Clickmap Displaysmentioning
confidence: 99%