2020
DOI: 10.25368/2022.261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Answering Regular Path Queries Under Approximate Semantics in Lightweight Description Logics

Abstract: Classical regular path queries (RPQs) can be too restrictive for some applications and answering such queries under approximate semantics to relax the query is desirable. While for answering regular path queries over graph databases under approximate semantics algorithms are available, such algorithms are scarce for the ontology-mediated setting. In this paper we extend an approach for answering RPQs over graph databases that uses weighted transducers to approximate paths from the query in two ways. The first … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, it is not hard to transform Algorithm 1 into a polynomial time algorithm (called Algorithm 1c), that uses Dijkstra's shortest path algorithm to compute the set cert T (q, K). All the details are provided in (Fernández Gil and Turhan 2020). Thus, together with the lower bounds presented in (Bienvenu, Ortiz, and Simkus 2015) for the classical semantics, we obtain the following results.…”
Section: Deciding τ -Entailmentsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, it is not hard to transform Algorithm 1 into a polynomial time algorithm (called Algorithm 1c), that uses Dijkstra's shortest path algorithm to compute the set cert T (q, K). All the details are provided in (Fernández Gil and Turhan 2020). Thus, together with the lower bounds presented in (Bienvenu, Ortiz, and Simkus 2015) for the classical semantics, we obtain the following results.…”
Section: Deciding τ -Entailmentsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Both, DL interpretations and basic forms of graph databases can be seen as relational structures over (unary and) binary predicates (Consens and Mendelzon 1990). For the rest of the paper we consider graph databases as finite DL interpretations (see (Fernández Gil and Turhan 2020) for a formal correspondence between the two notions). The semantics of C2RPQs over graph databases adopt the closed world assumption, i.e., answers to a C2RPQ q are simply matches in the graph database I G .…”
Section: Regular Path Queriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation