2018 SpaceOps Conference 2018
DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-2498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ant-based Mission Planning: Two Examples

Abstract: The Earth Observation market is growing rapidly, along with the missions' complexity. Therefore, automated Mission Planning systems are being designed, allowing for operators to simply specify their intentions on a high level. In this paper, we propose an automated Mission Planning System based on the ants' foraging mechanism and apply it to two different mission planning problems, from an Earth Imaging and a Data Relay mission, investigating the system's ability to be generalised. We compare the planning proc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the drift-angle constraint, Du et al [8] provide an area target observation scheduling formulation and propose an ant colony algorithm to solve the problem. Ntagiou et al [9] design an automated mission scheduling model for an Earth imaging mission and a data relay mission. Ant colony optimization is then applied to address these problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the drift-angle constraint, Du et al [8] provide an area target observation scheduling formulation and propose an ant colony algorithm to solve the problem. Ntagiou et al [9] design an automated mission scheduling model for an Earth imaging mission and a data relay mission. Ant colony optimization is then applied to address these problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practical satellite scheduling, the uncertainty, which origins from the change of mission priority, weather conditions and satellite resource status, is inevitable. Considerable researchers have studied the scheduling problem for both CEOS and AEOS, in which the uncertainty derived from dynamic missions and emergency responses have been considered [25,26,27,28,29]. On account of the widespread application of optical sensors on the EOS, the observation mission is extremely influenced by the uncertainty of cloud coverage [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consumption of resource l for target i on orbit k is represented as Cost ilk , and the remaining amount of resource l on orbit k is denoted as Cap ik . In Equation(29), parameter p ik indicates the probability that target i will be successfully observed on orbit k. A larger p ik means that target i is more likely to observe successfully on orbit k. Then CF ik will be lower, which means that the corresponding resource will be allocated to the target earlier.The second part CF S ik |V T W ik | represents the proportion of the VTW of target i that overlaps with other VTWs on orbit k. The third part, m l=1 Cost ilk Cap lk , represents the proportion of the resource consumed by observing the target in the remaining resource. The larger values of these two parts, the later the observation of corresponding targets will be considered and scheduled.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximate algorithms are then adopted to approach a near optimal solution in a reasonable time frame. The intelligence algorithms including genetic algorithm [9,14,15], local search algorithm [16] and ant colony optimization [17] have been widely applied for the EOS scheduling. Besides, tremendous heuristic procedures have been introduced to arrange feasible EOS scheduling missions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%