2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-009-1513-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antagonism by haloperidol and its metabolites of mechanical hypersensitivity induced by intraplantar capsaicin in mice: role of sigma-1 receptors

Abstract: Rationale We evaluated the effects of haloperidol and its metabolites on capsaicin-induced mechanical hypersensitivity (allodynia) and on nociceptive pain induced by punctate mechanical stimuli in mice. Results Subcutaneous administration of haloperidol or its metabolites I or II (reduced haloperidol) dose-dependently reversed capsaicin-induced (1μg, intraplantar) mechanical hypersensitivity of the hind paw (stimulated with a nonpainful, 0.5-g force, punctate stimulus). The order of potency of these drugs to i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
42
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
10
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that sigma-1 antagonism requires the presence of immune cells harboring EOPs to induce their opioid-dependent effects but that this is not the only mechanism used by sigma-1 antagonists to ameliorate pain. Our results are consistent with previous findings that the ameliorative effects of nonselective sigma-1 antagonists (i.e., haloperidol and its metabolites) in behavioral models involving central sensitization (such as the second phase of formalin-induced pain or capsaicin-induced secondary mechanical hypersensitivity) are not reversed by naloxone (26,27). The sigma-1 receptor is a ligand-regulated chaperone that participates in pain neurotransmission through multiple pathways (3).…”
Section: Effects Of Sigma-1 Antagonists On Acute Inflammatory Hyperalsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These results suggest that sigma-1 antagonism requires the presence of immune cells harboring EOPs to induce their opioid-dependent effects but that this is not the only mechanism used by sigma-1 antagonists to ameliorate pain. Our results are consistent with previous findings that the ameliorative effects of nonselective sigma-1 antagonists (i.e., haloperidol and its metabolites) in behavioral models involving central sensitization (such as the second phase of formalin-induced pain or capsaicin-induced secondary mechanical hypersensitivity) are not reversed by naloxone (26,27). The sigma-1 receptor is a ligand-regulated chaperone that participates in pain neurotransmission through multiple pathways (3).…”
Section: Effects Of Sigma-1 Antagonists On Acute Inflammatory Hyperalsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As expected, the known s 1 antagonist BD-1063 inhibited [ 3 H](1)-pentazocine specific binding in a concentration-dependent manner, with an IC 50 value of 40.21 6 3.24 nM. This value was similar to that found in previous studies (Entrena et al, 2009a;Cobos et al, 2005Cobos et al, , 2006Cobos et al, , 2007. However, none of the opioid drugs (fentanyl, oxycodone, morphine, buprenorphine, tramadol, loperamide, naloxone, or naloxone methiodide) significantly inhibited [ (Fig.…”
Section: Modulation Of Peripheral M-opioid Analgesia By S 1 Receptorssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Most experiments were performed in female WT (Charles River, Barcelona, Spain) and s 1 -KO CD-1 mice (Laboratorios Esteve, Barcelona, Spain) weighing 25-30 g. The knockout mice were backcrossed for 10 generations to a CD-1 genetic background as described previously (Entrena et al, 2009a). Some experiments were also performed in male WT mice to ensure that sex differences did not affect our results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, recent studies using σ1R knock‐out mice and pharmacological interventions with selective σ1R antagonists (Romero et al., 2012) showed an antinociceptive effect of σ1R modulation independent of the opioid system. σ1R knock‐out mice showed attenuated nociceptive responses in the formalin test (Cendán et al., 2005), in sciatic nerve injury (de la Puente et al., 2009), in capsaicin sensitization (Entrena et al., 2009) and in antitumoral‐induced cold and mechanical allodynia (Nieto et al., 2012). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%