2019
DOI: 10.1111/lam.13133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antagonistic effects ofStreptococcusandLactobacillusprobiotics in pharyngeal biofilms

Abstract: Significance and Impact of the Study: Candidate probiotic bacteria deployed to prevent or treat bacterial pharyngitis will interact with the target bacteria such as Streptococcus pyogenes as well as with the microbiota of the throat, where off-target effects are possible. Three candidate probiotics Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus plantarum and Streptococcus salivarius reduced viability within extant S. pyogenes biofilms through the elaboration of diffusible factors other than fermentation acids but di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and S. salivarius were tested for inhibition toward S. pyogenes cultures in deferred antagonism agar assays. The results show that these strains have anti-biofilm effects, especially S. salivarius (Humphreys and McBain, 2019). The antagonistic effect was not dependent on cell-cell contact since the pathogen and the probiotic were not in direct contact, but separated by a semi-permeable membrane that allowed diffusion of bacteriocins as salivaricin A2 (SalA2) and salivaricin B (SboB) in the case of S. salivarius K12 (Hyink et al, 2007), acidocins (Acedo et al, 2015) and plantaricins (Lages et al, 2015), in the case of of L. acidophilus and L. plantarum, respectively (in all cases, the acidification of the media was not observed).…”
Section: Emergent Alternatives To Fight Biofilm Infectionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Recently, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and S. salivarius were tested for inhibition toward S. pyogenes cultures in deferred antagonism agar assays. The results show that these strains have anti-biofilm effects, especially S. salivarius (Humphreys and McBain, 2019). The antagonistic effect was not dependent on cell-cell contact since the pathogen and the probiotic were not in direct contact, but separated by a semi-permeable membrane that allowed diffusion of bacteriocins as salivaricin A2 (SalA2) and salivaricin B (SboB) in the case of S. salivarius K12 (Hyink et al, 2007), acidocins (Acedo et al, 2015) and plantaricins (Lages et al, 2015), in the case of of L. acidophilus and L. plantarum, respectively (in all cases, the acidification of the media was not observed).…”
Section: Emergent Alternatives To Fight Biofilm Infectionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…An increasing number of studies have elucidated the fundamental probiotic effects of Lactobacillus against pathogens present in the GI tract, oral cavity, vagina, and epidermal layer [ 149 152 ]. Lactobacillus acidophilus KS400 has been proven to produce bacteriocin through fermentation and inhibited the growth of urogenital pathogens such as G. vaginalis , S. agalactiae , and P. aeruginosa [ 153 ].…”
Section: Potential Of Lactobacillus In Keeping Vagmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antagonism towards S. pyogenes by some lactobacillus species is seen as a possible alternative to antibiotherapy for acute pharyngitis [74, 75], commonly reported in the local population [76]. It results in part from the production of organic acids and bacteriocins, but the ability to produce H 2 O 2 is another important mechanism of bacterial antagonism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%