2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.94.155146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antagonistic effects of nearest-neighbor repulsion on the superconducting pairing dynamics in the doped Mott insulator regime

Abstract: The nearest-neighbor superexchange-mediated mechanism for d x 2 −y 2 superconductivity in the one-band Hubbard model faces the challenge that nearest-neighbor Coulomb repulsion can be larger than superexchange. To answer this question, we use cellular dynamical mean-field theory (CDMFT) with a continuous-time quantum Monte Carlo solver to determine the superconducting phase diagram as a function of temperature and doping for on-site repulsion U = 9t and nearest-neighbor repulsion V = 0, 2t, 4t. In the underdop… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A Kramers-Krönig analysis shows that this pole considerably lifts the low-energy value of ReΣ ano , enhancing the superconductivity 26,27,29,34,39,42 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A Kramers-Krönig analysis shows that this pole considerably lifts the low-energy value of ReΣ ano , enhancing the superconductivity 26,27,29,34,39,42 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This result validates and substantiates the long-standing but still-speculative argument that the Mott-insulating state at zero doping is at the origin of the high-T c superconductivity, revealing the microscopic mechanism in terms of the self-energy structure. Figure 1(a) schematically illustrates the dopingtemperature (T ) phase diagram of the two-dimensional Hubbard model, obtained by quantum-cluster theories 3,14-18 , close to half filling (δ = 0) and at intermediate-to-strong coupling 3,4,[35][36][37][38][39] . The Mott-insulating state appears at δ = 0, where the self-energy shows a prominent pole [at ω 1 in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) solvers, especially state of the art continuous-time (CT-QMC) solvers [27] are free of bath parametrization ambiguities. Up to now, CT-QMC solvers have been used to study only the superconducting [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] and the antiferromagnetic phases [28,43,44] separately. In principle, the question of coexistence can be addressed with these approaches, but this has yet to be done.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Refs. [64,69,70] established that pseudogap formation and superconducting pairing are both linked through short-ranged spin physics [71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78]. Closer to aforementioned experiments, Refs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%