2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2009.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antagonistic variable stiffness elements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Few of the systems discussed in the literature are compared with this work for comfort and handling evaluation. Azadi et al 20,21 developed a variable stiffness mount with pre-stressed cable-based mechanism. The stiffness has been varied from 160 to 510 N/mm.…”
Section: Fitment Of the Real Size Shock Absorbermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Few of the systems discussed in the literature are compared with this work for comfort and handling evaluation. Azadi et al 20,21 developed a variable stiffness mount with pre-stressed cable-based mechanism. The stiffness has been varied from 160 to 510 N/mm.…”
Section: Fitment Of the Real Size Shock Absorbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Xian and Shuen 19 developed a system that can vary the stiffness from 50 to 80 N/mm, to suit applications in construction company. Azadi et al 20,21 have identified cable-driven mechanism based variable stiffness unit for an engine mount. Modified quarter car model is used to perform transmissibility analysis of the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structures constructed in this way are unlikely to be used for civil engineering structures, but might be appropriate for highly compliant structures, e.g. tensegrity robots (Aldrich et al, 2003;Mirats Tur and Hernàndez Juan, 2009) or tensegrity springs (Azadi et al, 2009). Furthermore, demonstation models are often constructed with elastomeric cables (Pugh, 1976;Connelly and Back, 1998).…”
Section: Compliant Cables/high Relative Prestressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 This actuation architecture causes two significant drawbacks: the necessity of using complex control algorithms to achieve the desired behaviors and a reduced energetic efficiency. 6 Azadi et al 10 and Boehler et al 11 proposed CDM as antagonistic variable stiffness mechanism which could provide a faster response, coming from the level of internal forces (prestress) in the links of the mechanism. The use of the prestress modulation to generate variable stiffness can be very effective to obtain large stiffness variations without modifying the equilibrium configuration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%