2017
DOI: 10.5210/fm.v22i3.7302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antecedents and consequences of cyberloafing: Evidence from the Malaysian ICT industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Managers may find it possible to stop their employees from crossing from one domain into another through cyberloafing via implementation of various countermeasures. This may include enforcing internet usage policies, imposing punishments and investing in internet monitoring systems (Koay et al, 2017). Companies can also issue a warning letter to employees who constantly cyberloaf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Managers may find it possible to stop their employees from crossing from one domain into another through cyberloafing via implementation of various countermeasures. This may include enforcing internet usage policies, imposing punishments and investing in internet monitoring systems (Koay et al, 2017). Companies can also issue a warning letter to employees who constantly cyberloaf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interested researchers have attempted to test for different antecedents of cyberloafing to understand phenomenon, which are broadly categorized into personal and organizational factors. Personal factors significantly related to behaviour include procrastination (O'Neill et al, 2014), conscientiousness (Jia et al, 2013), habit (Koay et al, 2017), internet addiction (Chen et al, 2008), attitude towards it (Askew et al, 2014), sleeping habits (Wagner et al, 2012) and boredom (Eastin et al, 2007). Meanwhile, associated organizational factors displaying significant influence consist of internet monitoring systems (Moody and Siponen, 2013), internet usage policies (Jia et al, 2013), perceived justice (Lim, 2002), punishment (Lara et al, 2006), denial of responsibility (Lee et al, 2007), managerial supervision (Seymour and Nadasen, 2007), job creativity (Vitak et al, 2011) and empowering leadership (Andreassen et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rising trend of cyberloafing among employees in modern workplaces has rendered it a problematic organisational issue as an excessive amount of time are squandered on non-work-related online activities (Ugrin and Pearson, 2013;Koay et al, 2017a). Some scholars cyberloafing behaviour as a means to avert ostracism in the workplace in order to protect and regain their personal resources, and to alleviate emotional exhaustion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unless other key considerations prevent employees from engaging in their habitual NWRC behavior (e.g., a severe internet use policy, electronic surveillance) habit can be a powerful predictor of NWRC. In addition, prior work has provided empirical evidence that habit is a key driver generating NWRC behavior (Koay et al, 2017;Moody & Siponen, 2013;Pee et al, Employees tend to make a lot of effort to engage in NWRC with prudence. Self-aware Employees tend to make a decision on whether they will continue their NWRC or not.…”
Section: Research Model and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%