2012
DOI: 10.1108/17511341211206852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antecedents and implications of uncertainty in management

Abstract: Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to explain the antecedents of environmental uncertainty in management using a historical framework. The goal of developing passion and compassion in management practice and research cannot be achieved unless a better understanding is developed of the main challenge facing researchers and practitioners -uncertainty. Design/methodology/approach -The antecedents of uncertainty in management are explored using a historical framework. This enables the generation of insights int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, under high environmental turbulence, firm with greater social capital suffers from poor firm performance. This finding is more relevant with Tang et al (2010) and Chawla et al (2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, under high environmental turbulence, firm with greater social capital suffers from poor firm performance. This finding is more relevant with Tang et al (2010) and Chawla et al (2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Firms with greater SC may achieve the goals under low environmental turbulence. Under environmental turbulence, social capital still plays pivotal role on FP (Tang et al, 2010;Chawla et al, 2012). Wang and Fang (2012) indicates curvilinear relationship between EO and FP.…”
Section: Hypothesis 5: Environmental Turbulence Has Moderating Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding uncertainty becomes a serious "organizational reality" (Huff et al, 2016). Determining how decision-makers respond in ways designed to reduce the negative impacts of environmental uncertainty is critical for explaining organizational performance and stability (Chawla et al, 2012;Perminova, 2011). This study builds upon the literature on general contingency theories (Luthans & Stewart, 1977), types of uncertainty (Milliken, 1990), models of interpretation (Daft & Weick, 1984), and the information uncertainty approach (Kreiser & Marino, 2002) to propose and test an exploratory model that empirically informs the link between a KM enabler and/or contingency variable (PEU, an external pandemic-induced uncertainty factor) and KM processes, which are KS subprocesses (KC and KD behaviors, two internal behavioral indicators).…”
Section: Contextual and Theoretical Underpinningsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the significance of visioning ability in enabling strategic work (Mintzberg, 2000), several studies have noted that the association between these constructs is contingent on both organizational factors and environmental dynamics (Ireland and Hitt, 1999). In this context, Chawla et al (2012) have identified environmental uncertainty as one of the key 221 Time orientation and strategic practices constraints faced by organizations today. Theoretically, research in change management purports either prediction or control to deal with uncertainty (Vecchiato, 2012).…”
Section: Time Orientation and Managerial Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%