“…Influential tweets, that can shape the attention of the press, are easy to read, plainspoken, and come from actors who are otherwise unavailable for contact (Parmelee, 2014); moreover, research shows that journalists are also more likely to cover tweets in connection to negativity, conflict, and scandals (Ekman and Widholm, 2015: 86). In this respect, journalists may just follow what generates activity on Twitter as existing analyses of the popularity of politicians’ tweets find that retweet likelihood increases with the size of the politician’s network and with the negative emotional content of the tweet (Walker et al, 2017). At the same time, this also suggests that strategies prominently used by populist politicians—such as cultivating a large online followership network, courting scandals, using simple language, restricting one’s availability for regular contact by journalists (Brands et al, 2018; Gonawela et al, 2018; Wodak, 2015), not to mention the high frequency of negative posts (Gonawela et al, 2018: 309)—may be particularly effective in allowing politicians to influence the media’s agenda, while at the same time, heightening “the salience of attributes that are favorable to the leader who is tweeting” (Parmelee, 2014: 443).…”