2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.01.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antenatal prognostic factor of fetal echogenic bowel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study, 7% of fetuses with down syndrome were associated with isolated HEB. Despite this high rate, HEB is not a specific marker for trisomy 21 but can be considered as a soft marker according to the literature (9,10,19). In a meta-analysis performed in North America, 230 cases were evaluated and in 60% of all cases, there was not the additional anomaly in the postnatal follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In a study, 7% of fetuses with down syndrome were associated with isolated HEB. Despite this high rate, HEB is not a specific marker for trisomy 21 but can be considered as a soft marker according to the literature (9,10,19). In a meta-analysis performed in North America, 230 cases were evaluated and in 60% of all cases, there was not the additional anomaly in the postnatal follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a meta-analysis performed in North America, 230 cases were evaluated and in 60% of all cases, there was not the additional anomaly in the postnatal follow-up. Karyotype abnormalities, intrauterine growth, and perinatal mortality rates were high in the diseased group (7)(8)(9)(10)13). Sex chromosomal abnormalities such as turner syndrome were determined among the aneuploidies, mostly trisomy 21.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Buiter et al 7 reported that all fetuses with isolated FEB had uneventful pregnancies with no pathological abnormalities postpartum concluding that isolated FEB is a benign sonographic finding which carries a favourable prognosis. Furthermore, Ronin et al 24 reported that the grade of FEB has no association with neonatal outcome and should no longer be employed. Moreover, isolated FEB and sonographic resolution of FEB are the strongest prognostic factors with a 6.6-fold and 8.1-fold increase in the chance of an uneventful neonatal outcome, respectively.…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%