Antenatal ultrasound screening for fetal abnormalities: a systematic review of studies of cost and cost effectiveness

Abstract

Objective To review systematically and critically evidence to derive estimates of costs and cost effectiveness of routine ultrasound screening for fetal abnormalities. Design A systematic review of the literature using explicit criteria for inclusion of primary research studies, a stated electronic strategy to identify relevant material, and an explanation of why apparently relevant studies have not been included. Setting All countries of origin were included. The results of this review are important to obstetricians and to health service managers in the allocation of resources, and others who are considering conducting further research in this area. Main outcome measure Formal economic evaluations and cost studies of routine ultrasound screening. Costs of routine anomaly scans and costs of other procedures carried out as part of antenatal screening by ultrasound. Results One hundred and ninety-nine studies were identified in total, 24 reaching the final stage of the review.Nine studies were formal economic evaluations and 15 reported costs studies or clinical effectiveness studies with some assessment of cost. The studies were carried out mainly in Europe and in the United States. After quality criteria were applied, data were extracted from six of the economic evaluations and six of the costs studies. One economic evaluation conducted alongside a randomised trial concluded that screening for fetal abnormalities by ultrasound in the second trimester was cost effective, compared with routine antenatal care. The costs of routine scans ranged from £18 to £204 and for non-routine ranged from £32 to £113. Conclusions There is a lack of good quality primary studies of the costs of ultrasound screening in pregnancy.Typically, economic evaluations of ultrasound screening have been based on poor quality evidence of clinical effectiveness. There is a need for more published data on the costs and cost effectiveness of routine ultrasound screening for fetal anomalies, and of the longer term consequences of screening for anomalies.

A structured review and exploration of the healthcare costs associated with stillbirth and a subsequent pregnancy in England and Wales

“…A structured approach to reviewing the economic literature was undertaken using established methods [17]. Typically because of the heterogeneity of the relevant economic literature, unlike clinical trials, such reviews rely on a qualitative critique of the relevant studies as opposed to a meta-analysis.…”

Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a systematic review of the economic evaluations and modelling

“…Two investigators (TR, SR) carried out the review using methods that have been described in detail elsewhere. 6 We assessed the quality of included studies using criteria that were adapted from published guidelines and had been used previously (box). 6 7 In the first instance the quality of economic aspects of the studies was assessed.…”

Applications of the Capability Approach in the Health Field: A Literature Review

“…This follows from previous reviews that have used this categorisation process to identify the studies of most relevance to the research question at hand (Roberts et al 2002). …”