International Conference on Radar Systems (Radar 2017) 2017
DOI: 10.1049/cp.2017.0489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antenna beam broadening optimization in space-borne SAR with AESA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contact methods of earth surface and atmosphere monitoring are being actively supplemented by non-contact, remote methods. An ever-greater amount of information is supplied by lidar [1] and acoustic sensing [2], measurements in optical [3], terahertz and microwave ranges [4], radar evaluation of environmental parameters [5][6][7][8]. Information value of active monostatic radars in relation to radiophysical properties of the sounding medium is determined by their capabilities in evaluation of its backscattering matrix for each element of the sensor resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contact methods of earth surface and atmosphere monitoring are being actively supplemented by non-contact, remote methods. An ever-greater amount of information is supplied by lidar [1] and acoustic sensing [2], measurements in optical [3], terahertz and microwave ranges [4], radar evaluation of environmental parameters [5][6][7][8]. Information value of active monostatic radars in relation to radiophysical properties of the sounding medium is determined by their capabilities in evaluation of its backscattering matrix for each element of the sensor resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the remaining questions were not investigated in detail. Existing research shows that (a) the change in excitation due to temperature drift lowers the probability of failure detection and increases the rate of false positives [5,15]; (b) errors in the measurement matrix also lead to low accuracy of excitation reconstruction [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%