2006
DOI: 10.3171/foc.2006.20.2.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anterior approach to the subaxial cervical spine in children: a brief review

Abstract: ✓ Although it was originally developed to address degenerative problems, including disc herniations and cervical spondylotic myelopathy in the adult population, the anterior approach to the subaxial spine has proven to be useful for select indications in the pediatric population. The authors review indications for surgery, bone grafting, and instrumentation as they pertain to children.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although traumatic OC destabilization occurs in all age groups, young children (< 8 years) are especially vulnerable due to hypermobility of the CVJ and increased head-to-torso size and weight ratios. 7,25,27,39,48 Although in the present study the mean age of patients with acute traumatic injuries (6.2 ± 4.1 years; range 2-16 years) differed from that of those with all other chronic pathologies (7.7 ± 4.7 years; range 7 months to 16 years), this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.3). Both traumatic 17,24,26,48 and congenital etiologies 12,20,25,44,52,57 are frequently reported as the most common causes of OC instability in children.…”
Section: Etiology Of Oc Instabilitycontrasting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although traumatic OC destabilization occurs in all age groups, young children (< 8 years) are especially vulnerable due to hypermobility of the CVJ and increased head-to-torso size and weight ratios. 7,25,27,39,48 Although in the present study the mean age of patients with acute traumatic injuries (6.2 ± 4.1 years; range 2-16 years) differed from that of those with all other chronic pathologies (7.7 ± 4.7 years; range 7 months to 16 years), this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.3). Both traumatic 17,24,26,48 and congenital etiologies 12,20,25,44,52,57 are frequently reported as the most common causes of OC instability in children.…”
Section: Etiology Of Oc Instabilitycontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…The incorporation of structural grafts strengthens the construct and improves arthrodesis rates. 3,4,6,7,17,40,57 However, the most appropriate fixation strategy must be tailored to each patient; surgeons should consider the underlying pathology, size of the spinal osseous structures, any anatomical variations, and extent of pathology. The size of the bone at sites of fixation is most often dictated by the patient's age and any comorbid congenital syndrome.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9,[12][13][14]16,17,19,21,25,32 One type of upper cervical spine injury, atlantooccipital dislocation (AOD), is a severe injury associated with high mortality rates. 1,2,11,12,[16][17][18][19][20]22,24 In postmortem examinations, evidence of AOD is present in 20%-31% of deaths due to cervical spine injuries. 6 In recent decades, improvements in emergency management, transport, and recognition of AOD have resulted in higher survival rates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,16,26,34 In moving from wiring constructs to rigid cervical fixation instrumentation in the pediatric population, the aim was to achieve increased construct stability, increased cervical fusion rates, reduced graft extrusion rates, and a decreased need for halo immobilization. 2,4,23,32 Modern spinal fixation instrumentation has been well established for pediatric spine surgeries involving the thoracic and lumbar spine; however, there are no size-specific implants recommended for the pediatric cervical spine. 3,5,[22][23][24]41,48,50,51 Hedequist and colleagues 23 have recently studied the feasibility of modern cervical spine instrumentation in children when rigid fixation was required for cervical stabilization and fusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%