2015
DOI: 10.1186/s13032-015-0030-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Anterior convergent” chest probing in rapid ultrasound transducer positioning versus formal chest ultrasonography to detect pneumothorax during the primary survey of hospital trauma patients: a diagnostic accuracy study

Abstract: BackgroundOccult pneumothorax represents a diagnostic pitfall during the primary survey of trauma patients, particularly if these patients require early positive pressure ventilation. This study investigated the accuracy of our proposed rapid model of ultrasound transducer positioning during the primary survey of trauma patients after their arrival at the hospital.MethodsThis diagnostic trial was conducted over 12 months and was based on the results of 84 ultrasound (US) exams performed on patients with severe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26 lower number were found on one point probing chest ultrasound that was examining only the 3rd intercostal space, midclavicular line for detection of pneumothorax found sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 78% which is lower than our results. 27 Study couldn't detect lung point be in six patients with pneumothorax and this is due to the position of such points were different from the position of the four points of BLUE protocol. This could explain why lung point showed sensitivity of 76%, specificity 75% and 76% accuracy (Table 3, Figure 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 lower number were found on one point probing chest ultrasound that was examining only the 3rd intercostal space, midclavicular line for detection of pneumothorax found sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 78% which is lower than our results. 27 Study couldn't detect lung point be in six patients with pneumothorax and this is due to the position of such points were different from the position of the four points of BLUE protocol. This could explain why lung point showed sensitivity of 76%, specificity 75% and 76% accuracy (Table 3, Figure 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 –11 A key component of our review was to assess whether this variability in sensitivities has improved among recently published studies. Despite the presumed improvement in ultrasound technology and sonographic expertise, studies published between 2012-2016 6,26 show no significant improvement in the sensitivity of ultrasound for pneumothorax detection compared to studies from the early 2000s. 27,28 Twelve studies published since 2010, demonstrated an equally broad range of sensitivities (52.8%-96.2%) with the use of TTUS to identify pneumothoraces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The studies collected data from 2000-2016, and involved a total of 2,955 patients who developed 793 pneumothoraces as detected by gold standard CT scanning (Table 1). 16 27…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the performance has varied widely between studies. For example, Ziapour and Haji[ 17 ] found that if the pleural movement disappears and the B-line is used, lung ultrasound exhibited a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 92% for pneumothorax diagnosis[ 17 ]. Press et al [ 18 ] found a sensitivity of 91.95% and a specificity of 89.10% for the performance of pneumothorax detection via lung ultrasound[ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%