2012
DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2012.703354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anterior migration of prosthesis following cervical arthroplasty

Abstract: We present a case of anterior migration of prosthesis that presented acutely several weeks following cervical arthroplasty. The implant was subsequently removed and the level fused. The cause of this unusual complication is speculated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inadequate fixation or pseudoarthrosis can result in eventual migration of the hardware and potentially erosion and perforation of the esophagus in extreme cases. 28 -31 Screw migration and esophageal perforation has even been reported to result in a delayed fusion. 31 Arguably, the number one cause of esophageal perforation is technical error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inadequate fixation or pseudoarthrosis can result in eventual migration of the hardware and potentially erosion and perforation of the esophagus in extreme cases. 28 -31 Screw migration and esophageal perforation has even been reported to result in a delayed fusion. 31 Arguably, the number one cause of esophageal perforation is technical error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Published studies of implant migration after cervical arthroplasty are rare. [ 1 2 3 ] This is the first report of bi-level Bryan implant migration after cervical disc arthroplasty. The ROM of the C4/5 and C5/6 implants was minimal (1° and 4°) 6 weeks after the surgery and the implants were deformed, suggesting that the implants were oversized and overloaded.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It should be noted that in our case, the symptoms not being as aggressive as those presented by the patient described by Tsermoulas and Bhattathiri,[ 6 ] revision surgery could be postponed and not performed in the context of the emergency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%