2021
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1722667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anterior Skull Base Sarcomas: Report of Characteristics and Outcomes at a Tertiary Care Cancer Center

Abstract: Objective This study was aimed to describe our institutional experience on characteristics and treatment outcomes of sinonasal sarcomas invading the anterior skull base. Design Present study is a retrospective review. Setting The study was conducted at an academic cancer care center. Participants Thirty-one patients with skull base sarcomas treated with primary surgery from 1979 to 2015 were identified for this study from a preexisting database. Main Outcome Measures Sur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, according to present evidence, the perfect timing to implement radiation and the cost‐value balance in complications is not fully understood 14,16 . In confirmation of the above results about high‐volume academic centers, it is worth mentioning that a recent report by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 31 patients with skull base sarcomas treated with primary surgery were evaluated and a 5‐year disease‐specific survival of approximately 70% was stated 17 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…However, according to present evidence, the perfect timing to implement radiation and the cost‐value balance in complications is not fully understood 14,16 . In confirmation of the above results about high‐volume academic centers, it is worth mentioning that a recent report by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 31 patients with skull base sarcomas treated with primary surgery were evaluated and a 5‐year disease‐specific survival of approximately 70% was stated 17 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%