1983
DOI: 10.3109/17453678308992864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anteversion of the Acetabulum and Femoral Neck in Normals and in Patients with Osteoarthritis of the Hip

Abstract: Anteversion of the acetabulum and of the femoral neck was determined by use of computed tomography in 47 adults with normal hips and in 39 patients with osteoarthritis. The normal anteversion of the acetabulum was found to be 17 +/- 6 degrees (mean +/- standard deviation) and of the femoral neck 13 +/- 7 degrees. In the patients with osteoarthritis the femoral anteversion was on the average 6 degrees larger than in the normals, whereas no difference was revealed in the figures of acetabular anteversion. The re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

17
199
4
8

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(228 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
17
199
4
8
Order By: Relevance
“…More exacting techniques are a shootthrough lateral radiograph of the pelvis on the CT scanner bed [14], or obtaining a three-dimensional CT scan so that the reconstructed pelvis can be reoriented anatomically before making measurements [1,19]. It is possible that inconsistencies in pelvic orientation explain the conflicting findings between studies that associate hip dysplasia with increased acetabular anteversion [7,12,22,29,42], retroversion [15,27,43,46], or no difference in acetabular orientation [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More exacting techniques are a shootthrough lateral radiograph of the pelvis on the CT scanner bed [14], or obtaining a three-dimensional CT scan so that the reconstructed pelvis can be reoriented anatomically before making measurements [1,19]. It is possible that inconsistencies in pelvic orientation explain the conflicting findings between studies that associate hip dysplasia with increased acetabular anteversion [7,12,22,29,42], retroversion [15,27,43,46], or no difference in acetabular orientation [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individualized preoperative planning with understanding of a patient's specific deformity is crucial to proper acetabular reorientation [21,40,46,56]. For example, uncovering of the femoral head by excessive acetabular anteversion or over-covering by retroversion are associated with acetabular dysplasia, hip pain, and development of osteoarthritis, but are addressed differently surgically [2,11,42,43,46,49,52]. Accurate preoperative knowledge of the patient's pathoanatomy requires thorough diagnostic imaging of the hip [3,17,19,34,52].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no groove for the obturator externus tendon crossing the surface of the neck, which is compressed anteroposteriorly (Lordkipanidze et al, 2007). Anteversion (femoral torsion) is 8 , slightly below the mean for most human samples (e.g., Reikeras et al, 1983, mean ¼ 13 , standard deviation 7 , n ¼ 47), but well within the range for modern humans (À5 to þ30 , see Yushiok et al, 1987;Hermann and Egund, 1998) Q3 . The shaft is straight in anterior view and displays the valgus orientation (associated with a high bicondylar angle) typical of hominins.…”
Section: Femur and Patellamentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Although effective in this new application, MRI does not allow soft tissue transparency around the bone limiting the ability to provide a global visualization of the bony contour. In contrast, computed tomography does not require the injection of an intra-articular dye or the use of an Auto-CAD workstation [ 131 and is already well established in quantifying bony abnormalities of the hip joint [6,31,32] 1 [9,18] with an accuracy of 14.5" [1,6]. Computed tomography is minimally affected by patient positioning on the gantry or experience of the technologist, thus permitting the acquisition of reproducible images between patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%