2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anthelmintic treatment affects behavioural time allocation in a free-ranging ungulate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, group size was also positively associated with feeding rate, and GIN-infected (control) individuals in the largest groups fed at rates that were higher than individuals in the smallest groups. Our previous work has shown that, on average, treated individuals feed at a higher rate than do controls [13]. Interestingly, here we show that parasite clearance allowed treated individuals to feed at a relatively consistent rate irrespective of group size.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, group size was also positively associated with feeding rate, and GIN-infected (control) individuals in the largest groups fed at rates that were higher than individuals in the smallest groups. Our previous work has shown that, on average, treated individuals feed at a higher rate than do controls [13]. Interestingly, here we show that parasite clearance allowed treated individuals to feed at a relatively consistent rate irrespective of group size.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…We monitored group sizes and GIN infection rates of nine anthelmintic-treated females to evaluate the effect of group size on parasite reinfection. Treatment significantly reduced GIN burdens in treated females (as compared to controls) for approximately 120 days [13], and we monitored individuals for approximately 500 days following treatment, from 4 July 2011 to 12 November 2012. We used regularly occurring road transects distributed throughout the day (06.30 -18.30 h) to locate animal groups.…”
Section: (B) Group Size and Gin Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In livestock, reduced forage intake is a common behavioural response to GI worm infection, which is thought to be associated with the up-regulation of anti-worm immunity (Colditz, 2008;Coop & Holmes, 1996). A few studies have also found evidence of worminduced anorexia in semi-captive and free-ranging hosts, suggesting that this response may be widespread in ungulates (Arneberg, Folstad, & Karter, 1996;Worsley-Tonks & Ezenwa, 2015). We used the nitrogen content of host faeces to quantify variation in buffalo intake rates since this measure has previously emerged as a key non-invasive indicator of intake rate in this species (Ryan et al, 2012).…”
Section: Host Responses To Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parasites can affect a host's growth and performance, across multiple taxa and life stages and at all levels from individual host performance to community function and structure (Barber, Hoare, & Krause, ; Craig, Jones, Pilkington, & Pemberton, ; Fenner & Bull, ; Hatcher, Dick, & Dunn, ; Poulin, ; Worsley‐Tonks & Ezenwa, ). Nonetheless, most research into the effects of parasitism has come from laboratory studies conducted under artificial conditions, or correlative field surveys from which it is not possible to unambiguously identify causal effects (Crump & Pounds, ; Kelehear, Brown, & Shine, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, global amphibian declines have stimulated investigations into the biology of microparasites potentially driving such declines; an iridovirus, an oomycete, ranaviruses and a zoosporic fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Blaustein & Kiesecker, 2002;Collins, 2010;Dang, Searle, & Blaustein, 2017;Kelehear et al, 2009). Infection by macroparasites also has negative effects on amphibians of many species (Koprivnikar et al, 2012) although overall, the effects of parasites on their hosts may have been underestimated (Dobson & Hudson, 1992;Minchella & Scott, 1991;Worsley-Tonks & Ezenwa, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%