1994
DOI: 10.1002/star.19940460402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anthology of Starch Granule Morphology by Scanning Electron Microscopy

Abstract: Scanning electron micrographs of the granules of 54 starches obtained from a wide variety of plant sources, consisting of roots and tubers, grains, maize, peas and beans, fruits and nuts, and small granule starches, are presented as a comparative study of their sizes and morphologies. All micrographs are presented at a magnification of 1500X with the addition of micrographs of 600X for the very large granules and micrographs of 10,000X for the very small granules.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

42
318
1
13

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 583 publications
(374 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
42
318
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Granules were found to be oval in shape and have smooth surfaces. The SEM images showed irregularly granule shape similar to the granules of immature sweet corn (Jane and Kasemsuwan 1994), but the surface has been smooth then. Starch from KKU-JD line showed few starch granules with pinholes on the surface at immature kernels (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Granules were found to be oval in shape and have smooth surfaces. The SEM images showed irregularly granule shape similar to the granules of immature sweet corn (Jane and Kasemsuwan 1994), but the surface has been smooth then. Starch from KKU-JD line showed few starch granules with pinholes on the surface at immature kernels (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Moreover, inspection of scanning electron microscope images of starch granules from multiple plant sources reveals considerable similarities in morphology between and within species [59]. A less subjective, morphometric approach proposed by Torrence et al [60] uses measurements obtained interactively from images of starch granules and multivariate analysis for classification (e.g. [61,62]).…”
Section: Analysis Of Archaeological Starchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For one, starch from modern, domesticated plants and that from their ancient wild ancestors may not be directly comparable morphologically; reference collections relevant to starches from ancestral plant varieties are not available. Moreover, inspection of scanning electron microscope images of starch granules from multiple plant sources reveals considerable similarities in morphology between and within species [60]. A less subjective, morphometric approach proposed by Torrence et al [61] uses measurements obtained interactively from images of starch granules and multivariate analysis for classification (e.g., [62,63]).…”
Section: Residues From Grinding Stones and Potsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to analyze the morphology of starch granules following the method of Jane, Kasemsuwan, Leas, Zobel, and Robyt (1994). Starch was spread out on silver tape, metal-shadowed with gold/palladium (60/40), and mounted on a brass disk.…”
Section: Starch Granule Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%