2018
DOI: 10.5539/ep.v7n1p24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anthophyllite Asbestos: The Role of Fiber Width in Mesothelioma Induction Part 2: Further Epidemiological Studies of Occupational, Domestic and Environmental Exposure to Finnish Anthophyllite Asbestos

Abstract: Although people in all sectors of the Finnish anthophyllite industry, including their families, have been heavily exposed to anthophyllite there is no evidence for even a single proven case of attributable mesothelioma. A few cases have been claimed but the evidence either, that they were mesotheliomas or that amphibole exposure was solely to anthophyllite is, in every case examined, insufficient. Even among the population who lived in Karelia in Central Finland who were exposed domestically or enviromentally … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Com depósitos mundialmente conhecidos na Finlândia (Ilgren & Hoskens, 2018), a antofilita hospeda-se principalmente em talco-e biotitaxistos. Ocorre como lentes formadas pelo produto de zona de reação (anfibolização e serpentinização) entre rochas ultramáficas (e.g.…”
Section: Antofilita Tremolita E Actinolitaunclassified
“…Com depósitos mundialmente conhecidos na Finlândia (Ilgren & Hoskens, 2018), a antofilita hospeda-se principalmente em talco-e biotitaxistos. Ocorre como lentes formadas pelo produto de zona de reação (anfibolização e serpentinização) entre rochas ultramáficas (e.g.…”
Section: Antofilita Tremolita E Actinolitaunclassified
“…During my Finnish visit in 2015 Prof. Huuskonen said the issue of domestic exposure had never been looked at. Former Paakilla residents were also very concerned about their own health but never received any information from the FIOSH regarding their level of future risk from the historical exposures (vs) [see Ilgren and Hoskins, 2018]. Thus, whilst the Paakilla families and Tapinilla workers were concerned, the FIOH deemed "domestic exposure "just" an 'area of its own'" [Huuskenon, 1978] and apparently not own of theirs.…”
Section: Failure To Follow Up and Report The Health Status Of The Heamentioning
confidence: 99%