1981
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9422(81)84067-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anthraquinones from Vismia species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our 1 H NMR data of vismiaquinone (2) were in agreement with those previously reported (do Carmo et al, 1981); however, differences were noticed regarding the chemical shifts of some aromatic protons and carbon atoms reported in the literature. Therefore, unam- biguous 13 C and 1 H NMR assignments (Table II) were achieved with the aid of HSQC and HMBC experiments.…”
Section: Isolation Of Compoundssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our 1 H NMR data of vismiaquinone (2) were in agreement with those previously reported (do Carmo et al, 1981); however, differences were noticed regarding the chemical shifts of some aromatic protons and carbon atoms reported in the literature. Therefore, unam- biguous 13 C and 1 H NMR assignments (Table II) were achieved with the aid of HSQC and HMBC experiments.…”
Section: Isolation Of Compoundssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…3). Vismiaquinone (2) had first been isolated from the wood of V. japurensis (do Carmo et al, 1981), thereafter from the leaves of V. reichardtiana (Goncalves and Mors, 1981), V. parviflora (Nagem and de Oliveira, 1997), and V . laurentii (Noungoue et al, 2009).…”
Section: Isolation Of Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Repeated column chromatography of soluble fractions obtained fifteen compounds (1-15) including 1-2 from hexane-soluble fraction, 3-13 from EtOAc-soluble fraction and 14-15 from BuOHsoluble fraction. On the basis of their physicochemical data, and by comparing with those published in the literature, isolated compounds (1-15) were identified as chyrsophanol (1) (Sang et al, 2005), physcion (2) (Carmo et al, 1981), desoxyrhaponticin (3) (Kashiwada et al, 1984), rhapontincin (4) (Yoshiki et al, 1984), resveratrol (5) (Jin et al, 2002), desoxyrhapontigenin (6) (Kashiwada et al, 1984), emodin (7) (Choi et al, 2005), rhapontigenin (8) (Kashiwada et al, 1984), chrysophanol-8-O-E-D-glucopyranoside (9) (Kashiwada et al, 1984), piracetannol-3'-E-D-glucopyranoside (10) (Kashiwada et al, 1984), piceid (11) (Kashiwada et al, 1984), H-viniferin (12) (Ito et al, 1999;Kim et al, 1999), isorhapontin (14) (Artemnika et al, 2004), and emodin-8-O-E-glucopyranoside (15) (Zhang et al, 2005).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fractions 27–47, eluted with the mixture of cyclohexane/ethyl acetate (9:1) gave 1.3 g of brown residue which was subjected to further column chromatography to yield laurentixanthone (25 mg), 3-methoxyemodine (25 mg); compound C and compound E bivismiaquinone (40 mg). Fraction A eluted with cyclohexane/ethyl acetate (4:1), gave after repetitive column chromatography, kampherol (16 mg), laurentixanthone A (50 mg), 1,7- dihydroxy xanthone (18 mg), vismiaquinone B (50 mg); compound B,, 2-isoprenyl-3-methoxyemodine (22 mg); compound D. The chemical structure of each isolated compound was established on the basis of their NMR spectra (one and two dimensions) [ 2 , 20 ] and data recorded on BRUKER DRX-400 instrument.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%