2016
DOI: 10.9734/ijtdh/2016/22359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anthrax Outbreak Investigation among Humans and Animals in Northern Ghana: Case Report

Abstract: Background: Anthrax is a bacterial infection that affects both animals and humans. It is caused by gram positive bacterium, Bacillus anthracis. It is an acute, specific infectious disease of mainly grass eating animals including cattle, sheep, goats and pigs and common in areas where livestock are raised. It affects humans when exposed to the fur, blood or carcass of an infected animal. A single case of anthrax in any given geographical area has the potential to result in an outbreak in both humans and animals… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Ghana, the livestock population we identified at risk comprises approximately ≈ 25% of the total national livestock population [ 29 ]. Based on official vaccination reports ( Fig 4 ), our estimates of the livestock populations at risk indicates poor vaccine coverage; this finding is consistent with ongoing outbreaks in endemic communities in Ghana where vaccination has not been officially documented for at least a decade [ 39 ]. Barriers to vaccine uptake such as practices of livestock keepers my also affect coverage [ 1 , 40 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In Ghana, the livestock population we identified at risk comprises approximately ≈ 25% of the total national livestock population [ 29 ]. Based on official vaccination reports ( Fig 4 ), our estimates of the livestock populations at risk indicates poor vaccine coverage; this finding is consistent with ongoing outbreaks in endemic communities in Ghana where vaccination has not been officially documented for at least a decade [ 39 ]. Barriers to vaccine uptake such as practices of livestock keepers my also affect coverage [ 1 , 40 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Vaccination is generally considered a cost-effective prevention method for anthrax among livestock, and, as a result, among humans (4,16,17,30,31)…”
Section: Environmental and Laboratory Investigation Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most susceptible species are cattle, sheep, and goats, but anthrax can also infect other mammals such as pigs, horses, dogs, cats, and primates (4,5). The incubation period of anthrax in susceptible livestock is 1-14 days after oral exposure (3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A confirmed case was any suspect case with the above symptoms and laboratory confirmation of B. anthracis from a clinical specimen [28,29]. A suspected animal case of anthrax occurs when the animal suffers a sudden death accompanied with one of the following signs: Lack of rigor mortis (legs not stiff), blood oozing from the nose, mouth, and other natural body openings, subcutaneous swellings, rapid bloating, and dark non-clotting blood [30]. Additional symptoms in cattle, horses, sheep, and some wild herbivores include fever, dyspnea, agitation, and convulsions followed by death [31].…”
Section: Response To Anthrax Outbreak and Field Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After vortexing, the master mix for 10 s and in each well of the PCR plate, 22.5 µl of the master mix, and 2.5 µl of DNA template and control sample were added into a PCR plate. The mixture was put into the PIKO -real-time qPCR machine which was connected to a computer with an installed software and the results were read according to a quick guide of PCR analysis procedure version 4 of 2016 with a CQ value range of [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. From each sample, we ran against anthrax (B. anthracis) virulence plasmid Pag (pOX1) and Cap (pOX2) as described by Fasanella et al [32].…”
Section: Laboratory Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%