2013
DOI: 10.1179/1947461x13z.00000000020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anthropogenic Burning on the Central California Coast in Late Holocene and Early Historical Times: Findings, Implications, and Future Directions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results show that fire return intervals under five years result in grass-dominated systems irrespective of the succession rate of vegetation. This is consistent with trends observed in recent decades over Mediterranean-climate California (e.g., Minnich andDezzani 1998, Sugihara et al 2006) and with anthropological knowledge regarding Native American burning practices over central coastal California (e.g., Lightfoot et al 2013). On the other hand, reduced ignition rates allow buildup of fuels and succession from grassland to shrubland or from shrubland to woodland, as observed over California after implementation of fire suppression policies (e.g., McBride 2003, Meentemeyer et al 2008).…”
Section: Dynamics Of California Ecosystemssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our results show that fire return intervals under five years result in grass-dominated systems irrespective of the succession rate of vegetation. This is consistent with trends observed in recent decades over Mediterranean-climate California (e.g., Minnich andDezzani 1998, Sugihara et al 2006) and with anthropological knowledge regarding Native American burning practices over central coastal California (e.g., Lightfoot et al 2013). On the other hand, reduced ignition rates allow buildup of fuels and succession from grassland to shrubland or from shrubland to woodland, as observed over California after implementation of fire suppression policies (e.g., McBride 2003, Meentemeyer et al 2008).…”
Section: Dynamics Of California Ecosystemssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This primarily involves the introduction of anthropogenic fires that periodically clear the landscape of biomass and, in the medium-term and long-term, decrease the chances of potentially more destructive wildfires. The recovery of TREM was done through both archaeological investigations and ethnographic engagement with the ancestral indigenous peoples of the area (Lightfoot et al 2013; Lightfoot and Lopez 2013). These projects reveal that indigenous peoples used fire as a landscape management tool; understanding how they did so supplies alternative management pathways that recognize human management of natural landscapes is not a solely modern phenomenon.…”
Section: Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, interpretation of phytolith data becomes more powerful and robust when combined with other lines of evidence. A multidisciplinary team of researchers took advantage of this synergy while conducting an integrative historical ecological study of native people on California's central coast (Lightfoot et al 2013) which investigated the hypothesis that native people at Quiroste Valley Cultural Preserve (QVCP) used fire to actively manage vegetation at the landscape scale from the Late Holocene to the time of Spanish colonization.…”
Section: Phytolith Analysis As An Important Component Of a Multidiscimentioning
confidence: 99%