2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anthropogenic contributions to global carbonyl sulfide, carbon disulfide and organosulfides fluxes

Abstract: Previous studies of the global sulfur cycle have focused almost exclusively on oxidized species and just a few sulfides. This focus is expanded here to include a wider range of reduced sulfur compounds. Inorganic sulfides tend to be bound into sediments, and sulfates are present both in sediments and the oceans. Sulfur can adopt polymeric forms that include S-S bonds. This review examines the global anthropogenic sources of reduced sulfur, updating emission inventories and widening the consideration of industr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
74
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 192 publications
(199 reference statements)
5
74
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…There are indications of other parts of the OCS budget being underestimated, such as domestic coal combustion (Du et al, 2016). Emissions of biomass burning and direct and indirect anthropogenic emissions have been considered in previous estimates (e.g., 315.5 Gg S yr −1 in Berry et al, 2013, 224 Gg S yr −1 in Kuai et al, 2015, and 219 Gg S yr −1 in Glatthor et al, 2015), but a recent anthropogenic emission estimate by Lee and Brimblecombe (2016) increases this number to 598 Gg S yr −1 , which would already bring sources and sinks closer to agreement. They attribute the largest direct OCS emissions to biomass and biofuel burning, as well as pulp and paper manufacturing, and the largest CS 2 emissions to the rayon industry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are indications of other parts of the OCS budget being underestimated, such as domestic coal combustion (Du et al, 2016). Emissions of biomass burning and direct and indirect anthropogenic emissions have been considered in previous estimates (e.g., 315.5 Gg S yr −1 in Berry et al, 2013, 224 Gg S yr −1 in Kuai et al, 2015, and 219 Gg S yr −1 in Glatthor et al, 2015), but a recent anthropogenic emission estimate by Lee and Brimblecombe (2016) increases this number to 598 Gg S yr −1 , which would already bring sources and sinks closer to agreement. They attribute the largest direct OCS emissions to biomass and biofuel burning, as well as pulp and paper manufacturing, and the largest CS 2 emissions to the rayon industry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global anthropogenic COS sources are dominated by the indirect source from industrial CS 2 emissions during rayon production [ Campbell et al, ; Lee and Brimblecombe , ]. The emitted CS 2 is rapidly oxidized to COS in the troposphere [ Chin and Davis , ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with all indirect emissions from CS 2 , we use the molar oxidation conversion factor from CS 2 to COS of 81%. For industry activity, we use the U.S. carbon black production in year 2015 of 1.6 × 10 6 t. Production of the pigment TiO 2 results in direct emissions of COS. We used an emission factor of 14.7 g COS/kg of TiO 2 produced [ Blake et al, ] and industry activity of 1.26 × 10 6 t for the year 2014 [ Lee and Brimblecombe , ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These sources include direct emissions of OCS as well as indirect sources caused by anthropogenic emissions of CS 2 . The dominant 15 anthropogenic source is from rayon production , while other large anthropogenic sources include coal combustion, aluminum smelting, pigment production, shipping, tire wear, vehicle emissions, and coke production Chin and Davis, 1993;Lee and Brimblecombe, 2016;Watts, 2000). Temporally and spatially explicit inventories have been created for use in OCS atmospheric transport models Zumkehr et al, 2017).…”
Section: Anthropogenic Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%