2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anthropogenic effects on shoreface and shoreline changes: Input from a multi-method analysis, Agadir Bay, Morocco

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The beach at T3 was significantly eroded in December 2013 before the breakwater was constructed by the government to protect the coastline. The ability of the breakwater to the wave diffraction process, consequently formed a new beach shape (Aouiche et al, 2016). Absence of vegetation on the beach dune at T3 further indicated that transect was actively disturbed.…”
Section: Beach Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The beach at T3 was significantly eroded in December 2013 before the breakwater was constructed by the government to protect the coastline. The ability of the breakwater to the wave diffraction process, consequently formed a new beach shape (Aouiche et al, 2016). Absence of vegetation on the beach dune at T3 further indicated that transect was actively disturbed.…”
Section: Beach Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The area behind the jetty-type breakwater at Tok Jembal, however, displayed a positive +8 m accretion. According to Saengsupavanich (2013), Aouiche et al (2016) and Prukpitikul et al (2018), the jetty-type breakwater (or detached breakwaters) is able to reduce storm-associated energy, such as strong currents and waves, which has resulted in sediment accretion behind the breakwater.…”
Section: Shoreline Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The digitizing error (E d ) was calculated as the standard deviation of differences of the shoreline position between three repeated digitizations [44] and it was estimated within the range of ±0.8 m to ±2.3 m. The pixel error (E p ) was identified as the pixel size of an image [44], ranging from ±0.34 m to ±0.67 m in satellite images and from ±1.6 to 1.8 m in aerial photographs. The tidal error (E t ), being the horizontal movement of shoreline position due to vertical fluctuations of tides, was estimated as the ratio of tidal amplitude to beach slope [14]. Thus, the "total shoreline position error (E sp )" expressed as the root sum of the squares of errors [43] E sp = ± E …”
Section: Analysis Of Shoreline Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coastal areas are highly dynamic and changeable systems affected by a number of natural and anthropogenic forcing factors, such as wind and waves directional change [1,2], currents [3,4], sea-level fluctuations [5,6], sediment budget [7,8], topography [9,10], tectonics [11,12], presence of coastal infrastructures, and sand extraction [13,14]. The results of the above processes can cause variations of shore morphology in long and short time spans, and therefore it can impact the coastal environmental quality, socioeconomic value, security of beaches and harbours, and natural resources [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kıyı şeridi; deniz, tabii ve suni göl ve akarsuların veya bir su kütlesinin kenarının kara ile birleşmesi ile oluşan çizgi olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Kıyı şeridi boyunca meydana gelen değişiklikler temel olarak insan, iklim ve doğal afet kaynaklı olmaktadır (Aouiche et al, 2016;French, 2001;Pardo-Pascual et al, 2012). Ayrıca, tabii ve suni göllerdeki kıyı şeridinin ani olarak değişimi, tarım ve hayvancılık için gereksiz su kullanımı, göl çevresinde meydana gelen hızlı kentleşme, turistik yapılaşma, ormansızlaştırma faaliyetleri gibi antropojenik faaliyetler sonucu meydana gelmektedir (Du et al 2001, Yan et al 2002, Penny and Kealhofer 2005, Legesse and Ayenew 2006, Kiage et al 2007, Aykut 2019.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified