2015
DOI: 10.1177/1049732315617480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anthropological Perspectives on Participation in CBPR

Abstract: In this article, we anthropologically explore one part of the process of Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR): participation. Participation in CBPR is usually conceptualized as whether, and the degree to which, community members are involved in the research process. Our focus regarding participation is less on quantity and more on quality of the interaction between community members and researchers; within this context, we elaborate the concept of "bridging" as it is understood in CBPR. Using data fro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although our findings provide this insight on strategies to improve nutrition in El Alto and similar settings, we acknowledge several limitations and suggest corresponding areas for future research. In line with an intercultural framework, this future work should embody principles of community-based participatory research (e.g., Belone et al, 2016, or Elmusharaf, Byrne, Manandhar, Hemmings, & O’Donovan, 2017) and/or transdisciplinary research (Berger-Gonzalez et al, 2016) to deepen intercultural understanding and action (Cartwright & Schow, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although our findings provide this insight on strategies to improve nutrition in El Alto and similar settings, we acknowledge several limitations and suggest corresponding areas for future research. In line with an intercultural framework, this future work should embody principles of community-based participatory research (e.g., Belone et al, 2016, or Elmusharaf, Byrne, Manandhar, Hemmings, & O’Donovan, 2017) and/or transdisciplinary research (Berger-Gonzalez et al, 2016) to deepen intercultural understanding and action (Cartwright & Schow, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our methodological approach draws on the rich history of reflexive analysis in participatory health research (Blanchard et al, 2017;Cartwright & Schow, 2016;Mayan & Daum, 2016;Montoya & Kent, 2011;Rutman, Hubberstey, Barlow, & Brown, 2005), as well as practitioner research in education (or "praxis research"). Here, practitioners "evaluate their own individual and collective praxis in the light of tradition and in response to current and emerging conditions and circumstances" (Kemmis, 2010, p. 20).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our social locations and relationships with the site would have also impacted our reflective process. CBPR literature often emphasizes community participation, without considering the intersubjective role of researchers shaping this process (Cartwright & Schow, 2016). Future studies might account for how social location, relationships, or larger sociostructural factors might affect the design and delivery of our CACs.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Her careful training of participants to use a camera, select images, and then work through their captioning leads to discussion and the use of pile sorting to identify themes regarding food use and vitality. She also highlights the process of building trust that allows for an increasingly authentic participation between researchers and participants (Cartwright and Schow 2016).…”
Section: Tempomentioning
confidence: 99%