Background and Aims
Disbursement of income assistance has been temporally associated with intensified drug use and related harms (coined the ‘cheque effect’). However, relationships to injection drug use (IDU) remain understudied. We examined short‐term ‘cheque effects’ and associated factors among people who inject drugs (PWID).
Design
Cross‐sectional analysis nested within a cohort study.
Setting
Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Participants
PWID receiving income assistance, with no employment income. A total of 613 PWID (median age 41, 83% male) contributed 3269 observations from 2011 to 2017.
Measurements and Methods
At each cohort visit, an interviewer‐administered questionnaire captured retrospective reports of injection‐related behaviour during the 2‐day periods (i) before and (ii) including/after receiving last month's income assistance payment (number of injections; drugs injected; any receptive syringe‐sharing). The relative likelihood (odds) and magnitude (rate) of an increase in injection frequency (‘cheque effect’) were estimated in relation to social and behavioural factors using logistic and negative binomial regression in a covariate‐adjusted two‐part model.
Findings
Prevalence of IDU and syringe‐sharing were, respectively, 1.80 and 2.50 times higher in the days following versus preceding cheque receipt (P < 0.001). Among people with past‐month IDU, most observations showed increased injection frequency (52%) or no change in injection frequency (44%). The likelihood of a ‘cheque effect’ was positively associated with cocaine injection [versus injection of other substances, odds ratio (OR) = 2.639, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.04–3.41], unstable housing (OR = 1.272, 95% CI = 1.03–1.57) and receiving opioid agonist therapy (OR =1.597, 95% CI = 1.27–2.00) during the same month. Magnitude of the ‘cheque effect’ was positively associated with cocaine injection [rate ratio (RR) = 1.795, 95% CI = 1.43–2.16], unstable housing (RR = 1.198, 95% CI = 1.02–1.38) and frequent injection (RR = 2.938, 95% CI = 2.43–3.44), but inversely associated with opioid agonist therapy (RR = 0.817, 95% CI = 0.68–0.95) and prescription opioid injection (RR = 0.794, 95% CI = 0.66–0.93).
Conclusion
Among people who inject drugs in Montreal, Canada, injection drug use and receptive syringe‐sharing appear to be more prevalent in the 2 days after versus before receiving income assistance. The odds and rate of individual‐level increases in injection frequency appear to be positively associated with cocaine injection (versus injection of other substances) and unstable housing.