Anthropological Research Study of Migrants at the First Aid and Reception Center (CPSA) of Lampedusa

Abstract

A medical anthropology research study was conducted in 2015 at the First Aid and Reception Center (CPSA) on the island of Lampedusa (Italy) as part of a larger health project carried out by the National Institute for Health, Migration and Poverty (INMP) in Rome. The study investigated the health conditions of migrants at the moment of their departure and on arrival, their migration journey, and their life plans and expectations for the future. The ethnographic method adopted for the study was based on participant observation and on data collection by means of a semi-structured interview (51 items simultaneously translated by cultural mediators into Tigrinya, Arabic, English, and French). Interviewed were 112 adults (82 men and 30 women) from the Gulf of Guinea and the Horn of Africa. The cooccurrence of forced migration and economic concerns was confirmed; violence and torture were constants throughout the migration journey in 81% of cases. Ethnographic data detailed the timing, countries, settings, perpetrators, and types of violence endured. A combination of qualitative and quantitative findings can both facilitate the identification of fragile health conditions and support clinicians in the diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitation pathways. These data illustrate the importance and feasibility of multidisciplinary collaboration even in emergency contexts.

Prevalence of physical violence against people in insecure migration status: A systematic review and meta-analysis

“…Generally, there was a lot of diversity in the way violence was conceptualised and measured. Hadush et al [ 86 ], Logie et al [ 88 ], Ogbonnaya et al [ 72 ], Okenwa-Emegwa et al [ 73 ], Segneri [ 90 ], Stewart et al [ 78 ] and Zadnik et al [ 82 ] all adopted a validated tool to measure violence (see Table 1 ).…”

“…Studies measured insecure immigration status in a number of different ways. These included ‘undocumented’ [ 22 , 64 – 67 , 69 , 72 , 74 , 75 , 77 , 80 – 82 , 85 , 89 ], ‘refugee /asylum seeker’ [ 62 , 63 , 68 , 70 , 71 , 73 , 83 , 84 , 86 – 88 , 90 , 91 ], ‘spousal /family visa’, ‘employment related’ [ 31 , 76 , 79 ]. Two studies measured more than one status but sufficiently disaggregated the data to allow for insecure status to be verified [ 78 ].…”