2015
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anthropology and Heritage Regimes

Abstract: This review unpacks some of the assumptions that underpin contemporary national heritage regimes. The genealogy of modern heritage exposes the entanglement of heritage, entitlement, resources, and property and underpins the frame of the modern nation-state. The article also highlights the implications of this genealogy for the processes of objectification, recognition, and new, expanded, ethical subject positions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
40
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…There are some specific examples where the notion of entanglement has already been deployed within heritage studies. In cultural studies and in relation to heritage practices and meanings, entanglement denotes relationships between heritage with the law (Gnecco 2015), between different meanings of heritage inscribed in a site (Apaydin 2017) and between heritage, entitlement, resources and property (Geismer 2015). At a conceptual level, Falser and Juneja (2013) emphasise how cultural heritage entangles the social, mental and material aspects of culture between local social practices and global virtual realities.…”
Section: Cultural Heritage Entanglementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some specific examples where the notion of entanglement has already been deployed within heritage studies. In cultural studies and in relation to heritage practices and meanings, entanglement denotes relationships between heritage with the law (Gnecco 2015), between different meanings of heritage inscribed in a site (Apaydin 2017) and between heritage, entitlement, resources and property (Geismer 2015). At a conceptual level, Falser and Juneja (2013) emphasise how cultural heritage entangles the social, mental and material aspects of culture between local social practices and global virtual realities.…”
Section: Cultural Heritage Entanglementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() have developed the concept of a “heritage regime” to suggest that heritage is no longer simply the object, but the government and politics around which objects are inserted. Heritage thus is both a resource and a form of “governance and … an experiential domain for citizens on the ground” (Geismer :72). Castañeda has also argued that heritage is less the thing, the patrimonial object, than the specific configuration into which that thing is embedded, becoming both a resource and a form of governmentality (:293).…”
Section: Heritage As Cultural Resourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heritage, often glossed as an indigenous knowledge assemblage, has become one of Peru's most important economic resources, with everything from food to dance to archaeological sites commercialized and marketed to global tourists and locals alike. But, as Lisa Breglia and others have shown, heritage no longer demarcates only an object (Breglia ; Geismar ; Harrison ). Instead, heritage is a spatializing and territorializing practice produced through various discursive regimes, making it an endlessly renewable if not a deeply ambivalent resource (Breglia :14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participation involves a 'whole constellation of different degrees and conceptions of agency and control at work … and the specific complexities of particular contexts for collaboration require acknowledgement' (Schneider and Wright 2013: 11). Perhaps it is also important to state that, although anthropology has been critiqued for its anti-aestheticism, Geismar and Empson (2004) argue that anthropologists such as Edwards (2002), Gell (1998) and Pinney and Thomas (2001) have acknowledged the power of the visual both 'in its own terms, as well as through more academic discourse (in which) the importance of the visual (is) a crucially material category in vital interaction with socio-political, economic and cultural contexts' (Geismar and Empson 2004: 44). There is a difference too between anti-aestheticism and 'beyond aestheticism'.…”
Section: Inspiration Emotion Time Memory and Walkingmentioning
confidence: 99%