2022
DOI: 10.1515/9780857457264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anthropology and Political Science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While it does not allow for the reduction of edges, it shows which concepts have most edges associated with them. It facilitates, therefore, a more systematic determination of which discursive elements constitute what is known in cultural anthropology as root paradigms, key metaphors, dominant schemata or central symbols of a given culture [40,2].…”
Section: Mapping Network Reduction Techniques Onto Four Major Approac...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it does not allow for the reduction of edges, it shows which concepts have most edges associated with them. It facilitates, therefore, a more systematic determination of which discursive elements constitute what is known in cultural anthropology as root paradigms, key metaphors, dominant schemata or central symbols of a given culture [40,2].…”
Section: Mapping Network Reduction Techniques Onto Four Major Approac...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Left, green and liberal groups 2018), whereby the novelty of political science and anthropology collaborations is emphasised (Cerwonka & Malki 2007). Meanwhile, some political scientists are critical of a 'newness' narrative; therefore, they highlighted political science's forgotten history of observational methods (Schatz, 2017;Wedeen, 2010) and, in the words of Aronoff and Kubik (2012), a 'convergent approach' between political science and anthropology. Indeed, evidence for the latter perception may be seen in the domain of the EP and EU institutions (Abélès, 1993;Abélès et al, 1993;Busby, 2013;Shore, 2000;Wodak, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…… These people do not know how to make sense of the new symbolic order and cannot fit into the new institutional design in which "civilizational competence" is king! (2006: 469-470) Supporting Buchowski's criticism, several authors have shown that the pathologized and orientalized "losers" of the transformation continue to engage with their circumstances in meaningful and apt ways (Aronoff and Kubik 2012;Burawoy and Verdery 1999;Rakowski 2016).…”
Section: Notes To Chapter Onementioning
confidence: 99%