Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences 2000
DOI: 10.1006/rwfs.2000.0757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ANTHROPOLOGY | Determination of Racial Affinity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Broadly speaking, the South African "white" population had its origin in Europe, with contributions, amongst others, from the Netherlands, Britain, France and Germany [12], [13] and [14]. However, as a result of founder's effect, temporal change and admixture, South African whites have become osteologically distinguishable from their European and North American counterparts (e.g., [12], [14], [15], [16] and [17]). The black population of South Africa comprises of several different tribes, but osteological differences amongst them are not great enough to justify separation [18].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broadly speaking, the South African "white" population had its origin in Europe, with contributions, amongst others, from the Netherlands, Britain, France and Germany [12], [13] and [14]. However, as a result of founder's effect, temporal change and admixture, South African whites have become osteologically distinguishable from their European and North American counterparts (e.g., [12], [14], [15], [16] and [17]). The black population of South Africa comprises of several different tribes, but osteological differences amongst them are not great enough to justify separation [18].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macroscopic sex assessment was possible for 75% of the adults, of whom 54% were females and 21% were males. Sex of non-adults was assessed only tentatively, as macroscopic methods are not highly reliable [30]. Sex of 31% of individuals was undetermined, 40% were possibly females and 29% were possibly males.…”
Section: Description Of the Ljubljana-polje Archeological Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Siyahlarda ise düz sagital kontur, yuvarlak veya dikdörtgen orbit şekli, dikdörtgen biçiminde damak şekli, alveolar prognatizm, geniş interorbital mesafe, düşük nasal köprü, düz nasal taban ve geniş nasal açıklık söz konusudur. Mongoloidlerde anterior ve lateral yönde çıkık zigomatik kemikler, dairesel ve eğimli olmayan orbit şekli, parabolik veya nal biçiminde damak şekli, küçük çıkıntıyla düz yüz, sığ nasal taban ve kürek şekilli incisorlar dikkat çekmektedir (Hoyme and İşcan, 1989;Gill and Rhine, 1990;Novotny et al, 1993;İşcan et al, 2000b;Marks and Synstelien, 2005).…”
Section: Adli Antropolojide ıRk Kavramının Kullanımıunclassified