Human Body Composition 2005
DOI: 10.5040/9781492596950.ch-008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anthropometry and Ultrasound

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Results using the Antrform method are in line with the recognition that it is very difficult for anthropometric methods to accurately estimate body composition changes 31 . Besides the significant mean bias found for FM and percentage FM changes with DXA, this method also presented a significant trend in the opposite direction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Results using the Antrform method are in line with the recognition that it is very difficult for anthropometric methods to accurately estimate body composition changes 31 . Besides the significant mean bias found for FM and percentage FM changes with DXA, this method also presented a significant trend in the opposite direction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Good‐quality ultrasound devices may cost $30,000–$50,000, making them slightly more expensive than the top‐end BIS devices but far less expensive than a DXA or CT scanner. The application of ultrasound to measuring body composition is not entirely new; it has historically been used for assessing the abdominal adipose compartment to distinguish visceral and subcutaneous fat depots 186 . Much of the research that has been done on ultrasound applications in muscle tissue has come from the sport injury and neuromuscular disease fields 187 , 188 .…”
Section: Bedside Methods For Lean Tissue Assessment: Bioimpedance Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally speaking, ultrasound involves the transduction of high‐frequency sound waves through the skin; the ultrasound beam is partially reflected back (as an echo) to the transducer from the interface of different underlying tissues (eg, subcutaneous adipose and skeletal muscle) 29 , 186 . How much the tissue reflects is expressed as acoustic impedance, and this ranges from the lowest acoustic impedance levels associated with air to the highest acoustic impedance values associated with bone tissue 29 .…”
Section: Bedside Methods For Lean Tissue Assessment: Bioimpedance Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Diagnostic (brightness-mode) ultrasound has been used for fat measurement since 1965 [33,34], and many publications followed. At sufficiently high probe frequency (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18), the thickness measurement accuracy is approximately 0.1-0.2 mm [3,6,35], provided that the appropriate speed of sound in the given tissue is used (1450 ms −1 in fat [18][19][20][21][22]). The high accuracy enables measuring the embedded fibrous structures, which amount to substantial percentages of the SAT (Fig.…”
Section: Ultrasound Brightness-mode Imaging and Distance Measurement mentioning
confidence: 99%