1967
DOI: 10.1080/00140136708930836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anthropometry of Elderly Women

Abstract: Anthropometric dimensions of 100 elderly Birmingham women, measurod in 1964, are comparod with similar dimensions measurcd by Roberts in 1960 on olderly womon in the Homo Counties. Satisfactory agreement was found between the two sots of dnta. I t is concluded that, from a practical design viowpoint, tho body dimensions of hoth groups of subjects are similar.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The anthropometry of the elderly differs somewhat from that of young adults (Ward and Kirk, 1967;Burr and Phillips, 1984;Shimokata et al, 1989;Kelly and Kroemer, 1990, for example). Stoudt (1981) points out that in the mean, persons 65-74 yr old are approximately 3% shorter than those 18-24 yr old.…”
Section: Anthropometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anthropometry of the elderly differs somewhat from that of young adults (Ward and Kirk, 1967;Burr and Phillips, 1984;Shimokata et al, 1989;Kelly and Kroemer, 1990, for example). Stoudt (1981) points out that in the mean, persons 65-74 yr old are approximately 3% shorter than those 18-24 yr old.…”
Section: Anthropometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) di = ist difference of repeated measure n = total number of measurement In this study TEM was calculated in order to use the manual data as reference for test appropriateness of the 3D scanning method. The result are on table 3 showing that the values of TEM did not significantly differ in age. This means that the general procedure of manual measurement was applicable to the elderly.…”
Section: Tem Of Manual Measurementioning
confidence: 86%
“…The anthropometric data is essential for applying ergonomic principles to designing products customized for the elderly whose body composition differs from younger population [1]. The anthropometric measurement targeting the elderly needs to be developed as the anthropometric information derived from adults or childeren was not appropriate to represent the characteristics of the elderly [2][3][4]. The efforts to collect the data sets have been being spared to keep up the changing characteristics of body.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A short review over literature in the last 40 years concerning anthropometric data in several qualities about the population elderly or handicapped in the literature in the last 40 years results in the following: IUSA: Damon and Stondt (1963), Diffrient et al (1974), Stoudt 11981), Kelly and Kraemer (1990), Hobson and Molenbroek 11990), Annis (1996), Wright et al (1997). UK: Roberts (1960), Ward and Kirk (1967), Thompson et al 11972), Brooks et al (1978). ICE (1981), British Standard •~467 (1991), Pheasant (1998) Rogers et al (1996) Germany: DJN33402 (1981) and Flugel (1986).…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%