2022
DOI: 10.1002/mar.21739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anthropomorphizing religious advertising: The moderating role of political ideology

Abstract: We examine the anthropomorphism of brands as either a servant or a partner in religious advertising. Across five studies, we demonstrate that the impact of such anthropomorphism depends on consumers' political ideology. When exposed to religious advertisements (vs. nonreligious advertisements; Studies 1B and 1C), politically conservative consumers are more favorable toward brand-as-a-servant anthropomorphism (Study 1), which arises from greater state-based compassion (Study 2). However, this conditional prefer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 133 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conservatives believe that a hierarchical social structure is necessary and legitimate, while liberals think otherwise (Ordabayeva & Fernandes, 2018). Therefore, using authorities as message sources (e.g., military members; Goldberg et al, 2021) or using appeals that highlight the importance of hierarchy (e.g., portraying brands as subservient to the consumer; van Esch et al, 2022), rewards based proportionally on contributions (e.g., “The 100 most generous donors will receive first‐class seats”; Lee et al, 2018), or promoting a sense of superiority over others (e.g., “Just better”; Ordabayeva & Fernandes, 2018; “Make yourself superior to others”; Gohary et al, 2023) can be more effective when persuading conservatives. Indeed, conservatives' receptiveness to messages that highlight hierarchy (e.g., “Not all seats are equal”) increases when their political identity is salient (Kim, Han, et al, 2018).…”
Section: Level 3: System‐related Persuasive Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conservatives believe that a hierarchical social structure is necessary and legitimate, while liberals think otherwise (Ordabayeva & Fernandes, 2018). Therefore, using authorities as message sources (e.g., military members; Goldberg et al, 2021) or using appeals that highlight the importance of hierarchy (e.g., portraying brands as subservient to the consumer; van Esch et al, 2022), rewards based proportionally on contributions (e.g., “The 100 most generous donors will receive first‐class seats”; Lee et al, 2018), or promoting a sense of superiority over others (e.g., “Just better”; Ordabayeva & Fernandes, 2018; “Make yourself superior to others”; Gohary et al, 2023) can be more effective when persuading conservatives. Indeed, conservatives' receptiveness to messages that highlight hierarchy (e.g., “Not all seats are equal”) increases when their political identity is salient (Kim, Han, et al, 2018).…”
Section: Level 3: System‐related Persuasive Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%