1996
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.4.654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anti-Black prejudice as a function of exposure to the negative behavior of a single Black person.

Abstract: The authors examined whether the negative behavior of 1 Black male would influence White participants' perceptions of Black Americans and behavior toward another Black person. In Study 1, it was found that participants in the Black-negative condition tended to stereotype Blacks more than participants in the Black-control condition did. It was also found that participants who had observed a negative behavior, whether it was performed by a Black or a White confederate, avoided a subsequently encountered Black pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
67
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
7
67
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, many theories of modern prejudice (e.g., Dovidio & Gaertner, 1998) hypothesize that most Americans today avoid expressing prejudice when it would be obvious to themselves and others. Recent research comparing various experimental locations and setups indicates that in standard laboratory settings using explicit measures, American participants often express more positive attitudes toward Blacks than White targets (e.g., Evans, Garcia, Garcia, & Baron, 2003;Henderson-King & Nisbett, 1996;Ito, Thompson, & Cacioppo, 2004;Towles-Schwen & Fazio, 2003;Vanman, Paul, Ito, & Miller, 1997). We thus sought to replicate these initial findings with a new subject population, one that might be less concerned with appearing politically correct.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, many theories of modern prejudice (e.g., Dovidio & Gaertner, 1998) hypothesize that most Americans today avoid expressing prejudice when it would be obvious to themselves and others. Recent research comparing various experimental locations and setups indicates that in standard laboratory settings using explicit measures, American participants often express more positive attitudes toward Blacks than White targets (e.g., Evans, Garcia, Garcia, & Baron, 2003;Henderson-King & Nisbett, 1996;Ito, Thompson, & Cacioppo, 2004;Towles-Schwen & Fazio, 2003;Vanman, Paul, Ito, & Miller, 1997). We thus sought to replicate these initial findings with a new subject population, one that might be less concerned with appearing politically correct.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Increased levels of contact is predicted to decrease levels of prejudice, although potentially only under specific circumstances (Allport 1954(Allport /1979 but also see Dixon et al 2005;Pettigrew and Tropp 2006). For instance, some forms of contact are predicted to have either no effect on prejudice, or to increase it (Pettigrew 2008; for an example of contact increasing prejudice see Henderson-King and Nisbett 1996).…”
Section: Prejudice and Public Transportmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Thus, the activation and confirmation of a stereotype might influence the attitudes toward the group. That is, being confronted with a single stereotype-confirming member of a particular social group might affect the attitudes associated with this group (Henderson-King and Nisbett 1996). Put differently, being confronted with a stereotype-disconfirming member might reduce negative attitudes toward the group (Bodenhausen et al 1995;Bless et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%