Anti-Corporate Culture in Korean Society

Kim, Soohan; Lee, Myoung-Jin

doi:10.21562/kjs.2014.02.48.1.39

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In general, anticorporatism sees corporations as evil and dangerous to democracy and community well‐being. Kim & Lee (2014, p. 10) explained anticorporatism with a focus on “media's emphasis on the negative sides of corporations over positive ones.” Unlike the relationship between employees and their organisation that relies on precrisis reputation (Y. Kim & Lim, 2020), publics who are anticorporate believe that the power of corporations is excessive enough to wield control over politics and to endanger social justice and democracy. They also negatively assess and criticise entrepreneurs.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ethical public typology: How does moral foundation theory and anticorporatism predict changes in public perceptions during a crisis?

Hong

Shim

2022

Contingencies & Crisis Mgmt

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study proposes a new public typology utilising moral foundation theory and anticorporatism. The current paper conceptualised four ethical types of public (e.g., moralists, antagonists, optimists, and pragmatists) and conducted an online survey using a national sample (N = 1124) to test the applicability of the new typology. Our results suggest that different types of publics react differently in attributing crisis responsibility, expressing their emotional responses, and showing boycott intentions in evaluating a corporate crisis.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%