Anti-Corruption Campaign and Firm Financial Performance: Evidence From Vietnam Firms

Abstract

Background Corruption affects businesses in various ways. Anti-corruption, on the other hand, can improve the institutions of the country as well as business operations. Vietnam, as a socialist-oriented country with an ongoing high-profile anti-corruption campaign, provides us a unique setting to evaluate the impacts of anti-corruption on corporate performance. Objectives We address two questions: (1) what is the effect of anti-corruption on the performance of private-owned firms in Vietnam? and (2) how does anti-corruption influence the performance of firms with state ownership (FSOs) in Vietnam? Research design To investigate the impact of anti-corruption on performance of firms with different ownership settings, we use the establishment of the Central Anti-Corruption Steering Committee of Vietnam as a quasi-natural experiment for difference-in-differences analysis. We generate treatment effects of private holding and the state block ownership. To validate the findings, we construct a novel news-based anti-corruption index from Vietnamese online newspapers and use it in a robustness test to evaluate anti-corruption’s impacts on firm performance. Results and Conclusions We find a positive impact of the anti-corruption campaign on private firms’ performance, supporting the social norm perspective of how corruption affects businesses. The empirical results indicate a negative impact of the campaign on FSOs’ performance. The findings suggest that anti-corruption benefits private firms via improving the institutional quality of the country while improving the financial transparency of FSOs. Our study provides a method for measuring anti-corruption which is virtually unobservable and absent in the literature. The findings have implications for policymaking in contemporary Vietnam.

Silent but deadly: Political corruption and voluntary ESG disclosure in the United States

“…In areas with higher tolerance to corruption norms, firms may have the tendency to disregard social responsibility and choose the real option associated with corrupt officials rather than pursue ESG practices. Previous studies show that corruption has an immediate impact that increases carbon emissions (Ren et al, 2021), lowers ecological efficiency (Wang et al, 2020), and affects social norms and values (Barr & Serra, 2010; Hoang et al, 2022; Villoria et al, 2013). At the firm‐level, political corruption poses an obstacle to corporate investment in environmental protection (Yang et al, 2021).…”

Drivers of financial stability gap: evidence from sub-Saharan Africa

“…More importantly, the study highlights the relevance of the quality of institutions in determining the stability of the African financial system. Campaigns on anti-corruption (as a control mechanism) positively affect the performance of businesses by way of protecting their credit or funds making them liquid, competitive and sustainable (Hoang et al , 2022). Liked to that, Alshubiri (2017) recommends the introduction of a system that can detect risks in the banking sector as an effort to ensure financial stability.…”

Bribery in business sector: Vietnam's regulation and current situation

“…This number includes 1900 corruption cases involving 1,400 suspects. More than 800 people, including one incumbent Politburo member, seven former and current members of the Party Central Committee, four current ministers and ministers, and seven armies and police generals-implicated in nearly 90 cases of corruption and economic wrongdoing-have been convicted (Hoang et al, 2022). Vietnam's anticorruption efforts have brought certain results, on the scale of Vietnam's Corruption Perception Index assessed by Transparency International from 2015 to 2021; Vietnam has increased its score from 31 to 39, ranking 87/180 globally.…”