Anti-corruption disclosure as a necessary evil: impact on profitability and stability of extractive firms in Africa

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine the effect of anti-corruption disclosure on the profitability and financial stability of extractive firms in Africa. It also tests the convergence of profitability and financial stability. Design/methodology/approach The study uses an unbalanced panel data of 27 firms operating in five African countries covering the period 2006–2018. Anti-corruption assessment is done in line with GRI 205: Anti-Corruption. Profitability is measured using the return on asset and return on equity, whereas the z-score measures financial stability. The study uses the panel-corrected error regression technique for estimation. Findings There is evidence that corruption disclosure reduces the financial stability of firms. Disclosures on corruption analysis and corruption training are the main factors driving the reduction in financial stability. The effect on profitability is not significant except in the case of disclosure on corruption response, which also reduces profitability. There is strong statistical evidence to suggest that profitability and financial stability of extractive firms converge. This suggests that less-performing firms catch up with high performers. Research limitations/implications The study has relevant implications for practitioners, policymakers and the academic community. The study uses data that is skewed towards large extractive firms. Originality/value This study is premier in exploring the effect of anti-corruption disclosure on performance metrics among extractive firms in Africa. It is also unique in providing a test of both beta and sigma convergence of performance among the firms.

Climate Change Reporting and Corporate Governance among Asian and African Energy Firms

“…Institutional theory is one of the most used theories in Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting (CSER) studies aside from the stakeholder theory and the legitimacy theory [11][12][13][14]. As a social theory [15], some researchers posit that the institutional theory provides relevant insights to explain why firms react to external pressures such as social structures, expectations and social institutions [16].…”

“…Using form-oriented content analysis, we examine sampled corporate reports (sustainability report, annual report and integrated reports) of energy firms in Africa and Asia from the GRI database to measure the extent of climate change disclosure among African and Asian energy firms by constructing a climate change disclosure index (CCDI) [12][13][14]. This composite index is specified as follows:…”

Determinants of adoption of computer‐assisted audit tools and techniques among internal audit units in Ghana

“…Firms tend to operate similarly as a result of external pressures such as pressures from associations and professional bodies to which they belong. These isomorphic pressures exert formal or informal influence on businesses to behave like their competitors (Asare et al, 2021; Duho, 2020a; Duho et al, 2021). We argue that pressures from the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) on the need for its members to embrace CAATT would influence internal audit units' adoption decisions.…”

Consequences of Non-Financial Reporting Directive in Poland

“…Although corruption issues have become a standard element of mainstream reporting guidelines, such as those by the GRI, research shows that, overall, anticorruption disclosure practices around the world are still underdeveloped (Asare et al, 2021;Branco & Matos, 2016;Islam et al, 2017;Issa & Alleyne, 2018;Masud et al, 2022;Sari et al, 2020), especially when compared with other aspects of CSR disclosure practices . Reporting on corruption by many companies has often been superficial and incomplete because this issue is complex and highly sensitive, and public disclosures of such issues can lead to misguided perceptions (ACCA, 2008).…”