2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.124180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anti-icing performance of the superhydrophobic surface with micro-cubic array structures fabricated by plasma etching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
32
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
5
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ice adhesions reach 16.7 and 7.3 kPa at the structure volume fractions of the nano-pillar of 4.5% and 71.7%, respectively, which are generally recognized as ultra-low ice adhesion strength [22,40]. The tendency of the results is similar to that obtained by micro-column arrays on silicon wafer [41], which implies a strong connection between micro-and nano-structured surfaces. The variation in ice adhesion strength shows a similar trend with the previously measured contact angle, which is correlated with the structure volume fraction of the nano-pillar arrays on the epoxy resin surface, as shown in Figure 8.…”
Section: Ice Adhesionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The ice adhesions reach 16.7 and 7.3 kPa at the structure volume fractions of the nano-pillar of 4.5% and 71.7%, respectively, which are generally recognized as ultra-low ice adhesion strength [22,40]. The tendency of the results is similar to that obtained by micro-column arrays on silicon wafer [41], which implies a strong connection between micro-and nano-structured surfaces. The variation in ice adhesion strength shows a similar trend with the previously measured contact angle, which is correlated with the structure volume fraction of the nano-pillar arrays on the epoxy resin surface, as shown in Figure 8.…”
Section: Ice Adhesionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…A series of micro-cubic arrays were fabricated by Hou et al [ 94 ] on silicon surfaces by selective plasma etching. The effect of surface microstructure size on anti-icing and icephobic performance were explored in terms of icing delay time and ice adhesion strength.…”
Section: Fabrication Of Superhydrophobic Surfaces With Anti-icing mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Logically, if a given functional material pretends to be icephobic, it has to be capable of mitigating and/or suppressing all types of icing. From that starting point, the typical icephobic coatings must resist to the freezing of the impacting supercooled droplets (repel them or delay their freezing time) [52,58,[80][81][82], lower the freezing temperature of water droplets at continuous solid-liquid contact i.e., sessile droplet mode (freezing temperature depression) [58,77,83] and minimizing or avoiding the frost growth [78,[84][85][86][87]. However, if by some reason icing occurs, another characteristic feature indicating passive icephobicity is the reduced ice adhesion strength compared to plain materials [39,[88][89][90].…”
Section: Nomenclature Of Icing and Criteria For Passive Icephobicity mentioning
confidence: 99%