2022
DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2022.2138691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anti-IL-17A blockade did not significantly reduce inflammatory lesions in a placebo-controlled pilot study in adult patients with moderate to severe acne

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be particularly relevant in those with a healthy Th17 response, which could explain why so few with TNFi-induced acne had a history of acne. However, an anti–interleukin-17 antibody failed to provide substantial improvement vs placebo in treating acne . Future work is needed to better characterize the role of TNF signaling and Th17 activity in the pathogenesis acne.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be particularly relevant in those with a healthy Th17 response, which could explain why so few with TNFi-induced acne had a history of acne. However, an anti–interleukin-17 antibody failed to provide substantial improvement vs placebo in treating acne . Future work is needed to better characterize the role of TNF signaling and Th17 activity in the pathogenesis acne.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With many cytokines also implicated in acne pathogenesis, antibody treatments have been met with mixed results. Anti-IL-17A therapy has not been found to be significantly effective in inflammatory lesions in patients with moderate to severe acne [88]. However, superoxide dismutase 3 (SOD3) has been shown to suppress TLR-2 expression in sebocytes and keratinocytes, inhibiting pro-inflammatory cytokines like TNF-α and IL-1β, and reducing lipid accumulation [89].…”
Section: Acnementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, treatments inhibiting IL-17 and IL-23, namely secukinumab and risankizumab, respectively, have been effective in managing the stubborn SAPHO syndrome [308,309], underscoring the role of the IL-17/Th17 pathway in acne pathology [85]. However, a recent clinical trial revealed that CJM112, an IL-17A inhibitor with a unique target compared with secukinumab, did not outperform a placebo in reducing inflammatory acne [310]. Additionally, an RCT examining the efficacy of the anti-IL-1β inhibitor gevokizumab (XOMA 052) has been conducted, though results are yet to be published [106].…”
Section: Emerging Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%