Anti-Indigenous bias of medical school applicants: a cross-sectional study

Abstract

Background Structural and interpersonal anti-Indigenous racism is prevalent in Canadian healthcare. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission calls on medical schools to address anti-Indigenous bias in students. We measured the prevalence of interpersonal anti-Indigenous bias among medical school applicants to understand how the medical school selection process selects for or against students with high levels of bias. Methods All applicants to a single university in the 2020–2021 admissions cycle were invited to participate. Explicit anti-Indigenous bias was measured using two sliding scale thermometers. The first asked how participants felt about Indigenous people (from 0, indicating ‘cold/unfavourable’ to 100, indicating ‘warm/favourable’) and the second asked whether participants preferred white (scored 100) or Indigenous people (scored 0). Participants then completed an implicit association test examining preferences for European or Indigenous faces (negative time latencies suggest preference for European faces). Explicit and implicit anti-Indigenous biases were compared by applicant demographics (including gender and racial identity), application status (offered an interview, offered admission, accepted a position), and compared to undergraduate medical and mathematics students. Results There were 595 applicant respondents (32.4% response rate, 64.2% cisgender women, 55.3% white). Applicants felt warmly toward Indigenous people (median 96 (IQR 80–100)), had no explicit preference for white or Indigenous people (median 50 (IQR 37–55), and had mild implicit preference for European faces (− 0.22 ms (IQR -0.54, 0.08 ms)). There were demographic differences associated with measures of explicit and implicit bias. Applicants who were offered admission had warmer feelings toward Indigenous people and greater preference for Indigenous people compared to those were not successful. Conclusions Medical school applicants did not have strong interpersonal explicit and implicit anti-Indigenous biases. Outlier participants with strong biases were not offered interviews or admission to medical school.

Informing critical indigenous health education through critical reflection: A qualitative consensus study

“…The resulting gaps in health outcomes between Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations are a product of intertwined structures, power imbalances that reinforce social vulnerabilities, unfair distribution of economic and political goods and refusal to recognise or challenge the mechanisms and ideologies that target Indigenous peoples (Czyzewski, 2011). Moreover, research has evidenced that anti-Indigenous racism within Canadian healthcare systems is operationalised between and across multiple levels (Allan and Smylie, 2015;McLane et al, 2022;Roach et al, 2022Roach et al, , 2023Turpel-Lafond, 2021). Repeatedly, health service providers overlook, deny or disregard the distal determinants of health of Indigenous people as well as the structural barriers they endure (Czyzewski, 2011).…”